Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications

This is fine by me.

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:

> Hi Adrian,
>
> Per our discussion just now on IRC, I will proceed with the publications
> with the approved short names.
>
> As we discussed:
>
>  * I expect there will be new shortnames coming if we reorganize the
> documents.
>  * If we decide to change the shortname as a result in a future
> publication, the Webmaster
>    will redirect the previous URIs to the new ones.
>
> Therefore, we can evolve our shortname choices as we make progress on the
> spec organization.
>
> Ian
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Apr 18, 2016, at 4:04 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Ian,
> >>
> >> What is the process for selecting the short names for these specs?
> >
> > They were proposed in the draft documents.
> >
> >> I'm not crazy about the short name "payment-request" for the browser
> API spec given that we expect to have other specs that will deal with
> payment requests.
> >
> > Can you live with it?
> >
> > Ian
> >
>
> --
> Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>      http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
> Tel:                       +1 718 260 9447
>
>
>
>


-- 
Shane McCarron
Projects Manager, Spec-Ops