This is fine by me. On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:12 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > Per our discussion just now on IRC, I will proceed with the publications > with the approved short names. > > As we discussed: > > * I expect there will be new shortnames coming if we reorganize the > documents. > * If we decide to change the shortname as a result in a future > publication, the Webmaster > will redirect the previous URIs to the new ones. > > Therefore, we can evolve our shortname choices as we make progress on the > spec organization. > > Ian > > > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 7:49 AM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > > > > >> On Apr 18, 2016, at 4:04 AM, Adrian Hope-Bailie <adrian@hopebailie.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Ian, > >> > >> What is the process for selecting the short names for these specs? > > > > They were proposed in the draft documents. > > > >> I'm not crazy about the short name "payment-request" for the browser > API spec given that we expect to have other specs that will deal with > payment requests. > > > > Can you live with it? > > > > Ian > > > > -- > Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > Tel: +1 718 260 9447 > > > > -- Shane McCarron Projects Manager, Spec-Ops
Received on Monday, 18 April 2016 14:27:45 UTC