- From: Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 18:07:17 -0500
- To: Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io>
- Cc: Payments WG <public-payments-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 23:07:19 UTC
> On Apr 12, 2016, at 6:06 PM, Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> wrote: > > >> On Apr 12, 2016, at 5:59 PM, Shane McCarron <shane@spec-ops.io> wrote: >> >> Along these lines.... and not to bury the working group in administrativia, but I am super open to adopting a working model like the following: >> >> • Propose changes via PR >> • Debate PRs until agreed or rejected >> • Merge PRs that are agreed >> • Automatically rev the WD via Echidna (W3C publication tool that just works) daily if there are merges. >> >> Again, this is just a way of doing publications post-FPWD. A lot of W3C working groups use it. It generates a lot of "churn" when a document is in flux, but... it means nothing public-facing is stale. > > We’re going to discuss this at tomorrow’ call! I mean Thursday’s call: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2016Apr/0084.html Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2016 23:07:19 UTC