Re: Transition Request for 3 Payments Specifications

On 04/19/2016 01:05 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote:
>> This is sloppy. Short names hang out in TR space forever. Let's 
>> pick better ones if we don't like the current ones.
> We can and should revisit this as the set of our specifications 
> evolves.

Yes, but that's not what I was trying to say. We should pick new
shortnames before we're locked into them and we pollute W3C TR space.

Not standing in the road for this one, I know many people want to just
get on with publishing these documents, but 'payment-request-api' is not
particularly good especially because we know there is another "payment
request" API coming down the pipe.

-- manu

Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny, G+: +Manu Sporny)
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
blog: The Web Browser API Incubation Anti-Pattern

Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 17:18:55 UTC