> On Apr 19, 2016, at 12:18 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On 04/19/2016 01:05 PM, Ian Jacobs wrote: >>> This is sloppy. Short names hang out in TR space forever. Let's >>> pick better ones if we don't like the current ones. >> >> We can and should revisit this as the set of our specifications >> evolves. > > Yes, but that's not what I was trying to say. We should pick new > shortnames before we're locked into them and we pollute W3C TR space. > > Not standing in the road for this one, I know many people want to just > get on with publishing these documents, but 'payment-request-api' is not > particularly good especially because we know there is another "payment > request" API coming down the pipe. We have a lot of experience with short name evolution and so I am confident that as the group’s view of document organization improves, we will be able to manage change. Ian -- Ian Jacobs <ij@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Tel: +1 718 260 9447Received on Tuesday, 19 April 2016 17:21:42 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:43:15 UTC