Bethan Tovey-Walsh
- Spec language housekeeping (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- GitHub repo (Thursday, 10 February)
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Sunday, 6 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: extension and interoperability (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Scope of comments (Tuesday, 1 February)
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
- regrets for 1 March (Monday, 28 February)
- draft agenda for ixml community group meeting 1 March 2022 (Monday, 28 February)
- Re: Here we go again, pragmas… (Monday, 28 February)
- Re: Here we go again, pragmas… (Monday, 28 February)
- Re: an ambiguity in the ixml grammar for ixml grammars (Saturday, 26 February)
- Re: an ambiguity in the ixml grammar for ixml grammars (Saturday, 26 February)
- an ambiguity in the ixml grammar for ixml grammars (Friday, 25 February)
- Re: Range conformance (Thursday, 24 February)
- Re: Example serialization (Thursday, 24 February)
- Re: Serialization text (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: Spec language housekeeping (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: new test set in ixml-tests (wisps 1-20) (Tuesday, 22 February)
- new test set in ixml-tests (wisps 1-20) (Tuesday, 22 February)
- draft agenda for ixml community group meeting Tuesday 22 February 2022 (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (the real reply) (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: samples directory (action 20220215-01) (Wednesday, 16 February)
- samples directory (action 20220215-01) (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Minutes from ixml community group call 15 February 2022 (Tuesday, 15 February)
- Re: ACTION: Steven to draft a concrete proposal for [prefix handling spec text] (Tuesday, 15 February)
- draft agenda for ixml community group meeting Tuesday 15 February 2022 (Tuesday, 15 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Sunday, 13 February)
- static and dynamic (or: unconditional and conditional?) grammar errors (Tuesday, 8 February)
- Re: Test elem1 in the test suite (Tuesday, 8 February)
- draft schema for test reports (Tuesday, 8 February)
- draft agenda for ixml community group meeting 8 February 2022 (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Agenda counter-proposal (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Grammars are not Regexps (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Sunday, 6 February)
- Re: two solutions to Steven's challenge (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Refactor of the tests directory (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Test elem1 in the test suite (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- two solutions to Steven's challenge (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Grammars are not Regexps (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Grammars are not Regexps (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: Grammars are not Regexps (Thursday, 3 February)
- issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Test suite results (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Wednesday, 2 February)
- the futility of attempting to distinguish kosher pragmas from treyf (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: extension and interoperability (Tuesday, 1 February)
- extension and interoperability (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Test suite results (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Scope of comments (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- draft agenda for ixml community group meeting 1 February 2022 (Tuesday, 1 February)
Dave Pawson
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Sunday, 6 February)
- Re: Error definition (Sunday, 6 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Error definition (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- ixml extension functions. (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Minutes for ixml community group meeting 1 February 2022 (Tuesday, 1 February)
Innovimax W3C
John Lumley
Liam R. E. Quin
Norm Tovey-Walsh
- Re: Here we go again, pragmas… (Monday, 28 February)
- Here we go again, pragmas… (Monday, 28 February)
- Proposal: remove “.” from namefollower (Monday, 28 February)
- Re: an ambiguity in the ixml grammar for ixml grammars (Saturday, 26 February)
- Re: an ambiguity in the ixml grammar for ixml grammars (Saturday, 26 February)
- Re: Range conformance (Friday, 25 February)
- Re: Regrets (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: new test set in ixml-tests (wisps 1-20) (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (the real reply) (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Friday, 18 February)
- This morning’s hacking (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Thursday, 17 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Thursday, 17 February)
- A BibTeX grammar (Wednesday, 16 February)
- JSON output (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: samples directory (action 20220215-01) (Wednesday, 16 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- Is this ambiguous? (Sunday, 13 February)
- A grammar for property files (Saturday, 12 February)
- Re: Test elem1 in the test suite (Tuesday, 8 February)
- Re: Test elem1 in the test suite (Tuesday, 8 February)
- Agenda counter-proposal (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Refactor of the tests directory (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: Test elem1 in the test suite (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: two solutions to Steven's challenge (Saturday, 5 February)
- Refactor of the tests directory (Saturday, 5 February)
- Test elem1 in the test suite (Saturday, 5 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: Test suite results (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Test suite results (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Test suite results (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Pragmas summary for the meeting today (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Test suite results (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Test suite results (Tuesday, 1 February)
Steven Pemberton
- Re: Range conformance (Friday, 25 February)
- Example serialization (Thursday, 24 February)
- Range conformance (Thursday, 24 February)
- Serialization text (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Regrets (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Re: Spec language housekeeping (Wednesday, 23 February)
- Minutes ixml community group meeting Tuesday 22 February 2022 (Tuesday, 22 February)
- ACTION: SP to integrate resolution of #24 into the spec, and close #24. (Tuesday, 22 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (the real reply) (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (the real reply) (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (the real reply) (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Monday, 21 February)
- Re: A BibTeX grammar (Friday, 18 February)
- Re: ACTION: Steven to draft a concrete proposal for [prefix handling spec text] (Tuesday, 15 February)
- Re: draft agenda for ixml community group meeting Tuesday 15 February 2022 (Tuesday, 15 February)
- ACTION: Steven to draft a concrete proposal for [prefix handling spec text] (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: Is this ambiguous? (Monday, 14 February)
- Re: Test elem1 in the test suite (Tuesday, 8 February)
- Minutes ixml call 2022-02-08 (Tuesday, 8 February)
- Re: Test elem1 in the test suite (Tuesday, 8 February)
- Re: Grammars are not Regexps (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Grammars are not Regexps (Monday, 7 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Grammars are not Regexps (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Minutes for ixml community group meeting 1 February 2022 (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: Test suite results (Tuesday, 1 February)
- Re: The ixml test suite (Tuesday, 1 February)
Tom Hillman
- Re: draft agenda for ixml community group meeting Tuesday 15 February 2022 (Tuesday, 15 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Error definition (Friday, 4 February)
- Re: Grammars are not Regexps (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: issue #24 does an ixml processor have to match everything? (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: some questions about pragmas, and the arguments as I understand them (Thursday, 3 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Wednesday, 2 February)
- Re: Delimiters for pragmas (Tuesday, 1 February)
Tomos Hillman
Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2022 23:38:26 UTC