- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 12:31:31 -0700
- To: Norm Tovey-Walsh <norm@saxonica.com>
- Cc: public-ixml@w3.org
Norm Tovey-Walsh writes: > I think Steven proposed “prefix parses” and the media type for this > week’s agenda. There’s been quite a bit of email following. > > Based on that email, I offer the following counter-proposal: > > 1. Leave prefix parses closed. > 2. Discuss the media type > 3. Discuss open issues *other than* pragmas and namespaces ;-) From a purely procedural point of view, issue #24 is currently open, so if we want to stick with the status quo I think we need to vote to close it. > In particular, I’d like to discuss issues #31 and #33: > > https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/31 > https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/33 > I expect number #23 is in the same ballpark. > https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/23 I think there is a whole cluster of issues that all involve the lines between conformant and non-conformant grammars and conformant and non-conformant processors; they seem to me a cluster in the sense that the same principles that we use to resolve one of them will often determine or strongly suggest a resolution to others, and we have the best chance of resolving them all consistently with each other if we take them as a group. The draft agendas I have been sending out for the last few weeks identify that cluster as including #20 Conformance issues: what grammars to accept and reject? #25 Should the ixml spec distinguish between static and dynamic grammar errors? #18 Conformance issue: rule names and XML names #23 Disallowed characters in XML #21 Conformance issue: failures for extraneous reasons I agree that #31 and $33 seem to belong to this cluster. > If, miraculously, we got through all of those, I’d be inclined to follow > with #26, #28, but more out of interest than any belief we could hope to > settle them tomorrow. Sounds like a good idea to me. > Looking at that list, and considering the progress we make in 1 hour > increments, I’d like to propose that we pick a few issues and agree to > have substantive discussion in email about some of them before we meet > to resolve them. +1 -- C. M. Sperberg-McQueen Black Mesa Technologies LLC http://blackmesatech.com
Received on Monday, 7 February 2022 19:31:50 UTC