- From: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2022 17:32:06 -0700
- To: public-ixml@w3.org
ixml meeting 1 February 2022
When: Tuesday 1 February 2021 15:30 UTC for 1 hour
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=ixml+online+meeting+February&iso=20210201T1530
Where: Location: https://meet.google.com/dfz-rwpj-opq
Minute taker: Dave Pawson
IRC: the meetings will be minuted on IRC at irc://irc.w3.org:6667/%23ixml
Details of W3C IRC use are at [1] and [2].
[1] https://www.w3.org/wiki/InternetRelayChat
[2] https://www.w3.org/wiki/IRC
Previous minutes:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0155.html
https://www.w3.org/2022/01/25-ixml-minutes
AGENDA
Topic: Review of agenda
1 Review of action items
2 Pragmas proposal (continued)
3 Review and resolution of bug reports and technical issues
# 24 accept the whole input?
# 28 schema for grammars
- cluster of issues on conformance (20, 25, 18, 23, 21)
# 26 ambiguity
# 6 media type
4 Status reports
Status of implementations
Status of testing and test suites
5 Other topics
Minute-taking rota
Website
Release plan
6 Next meeting
7 Any other business
****************************************************************
Topic: Previous Actions
****************************************************************
ACTION (2021-10-001): Steven to draft a mediatypes proposal (see
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/6). (Held open pending
discussion.)
****************************************************************
Topic: Pragmas proposal (continued): what are pragmas for?
****************************************************************
At the end of the meeting of 25 January it was suggested that we
focus this week on what pragmas are for, and/or what pragmas are.
The immediate motive was to shed light on the choice of
delimiters, but it will also be relevant to grammatical questions.
Brief summary of TM proposal:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0029.html
Proposal: misc/pragmas-proposal.md in proposal-pragmas branch:
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/blob/proposal-pragmas/misc/pragmas-proposal.md
Background: misc/pragmas.md in proposal-pragmas branch:
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/blob/proposal-pragmas/misc/pragmas.md
(This is a longer discussion of the proposal, with alternatives;
discussion of requirements, desiderata, and design principles; and
worked examples showing how processors might use the pragmas
proposal for support of various kinds of additional functionality.)
Strawman proposal from SP:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0102.html
Specific issue: is there a reason for pragmas to nest?
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/30
Specific issue: are the constraints on what a pragma can change or do?
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/29
See also (older discussions):
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Jun/0003 (pragmas)
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Jul/0002 (namespace decls, locality)
During the discussion this past week, Dave Pawson asked that the
application of pragmas to parse trees be an agenda item:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0169.html
****************************************************************
Topic: Review and resolution of bug reports and technical issues
****************************************************************
Bugs: For a list of all active issues, see
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/
Topic: Design issue - Does ixml have to match the whole input?
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/24
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Dec/0097.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Dec/0102.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Apr/0007.html
and ensuing threads
Topic: Schema for grammars
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/28
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Dec/0009.html
Topic: Conformance issue: which grammars to accept and reject (et al.)
Several threads and open issues are relevant here:
- Accept ixml only or ixml and XML grammars?
- Are processors required to detect non-conformance in grammars?
- What constitutes non-conformance in grammars? Are some grammar
errors detectable only when exercised by the input?
- What should the spec say about other run-time errors unrelated
to the grammar and the input?
- What should the spec say about non-XML characters?
- What should the spec say about ill-formed output?
- What should the spec say about ungrammatical input?
- What should the spec say about ill-formed grammars (grammars which
are not grammatical according to the grammar for grammars?
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/20
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/25
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/18
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/23
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/21
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Dec/0072.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Dec/0073.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2021Dec/0077.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0028.html
Topic: Spec issue - how is ambiguity defined?
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0030.html
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/26
Topic: Media types
https://github.com/invisibleXML/ixml/issues/6
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0064.html
Topic: XML, VXML, output of ixml processing
Dave Pawson asked that this be a "(hopefully brief) agenda item".
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ixml/2022Jan/0150.html
Is this related to issue
****************************************************************(
Topic: Status reports
****************************************************************
Topic: Status of implementations
Topic: Status of testing and test suite
****************************************************************(
Topic: Other topics
****************************************************************
Topic: Minute-taking
Proposal: we should rotate minute-taking.
Topic: Website
https://invisiblexml.org
https://github.com/invisibleXML/
Topic: Release plan
****************************************************************(
Topic: Next meeting
****************************************************************
Normal date for ixml meetings is the second Tuesday of each month at
14:00 UTC
On the usual schedule, the next meeting would be Tuesday 8 February,
at 15:30 UTC, for one hour.
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=ixml+online+meeting-October&iso=20220208T1530
****************************************************************
Topic: Any other business
****************************************************************
--
C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Black Mesa Technologies LLC
http://blackmesatech.com
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2022 00:32:24 UTC