- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 12:44:21 +0000
- To: Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl>
- Cc: ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 12:38, Steven Pemberton <steven.pemberton@cwi.nl> wrote: > > What is the context of this question? Are there examples where you don't > get pass (with or without warnings) or fail? Not that, Michaels post (discussion Tues), talking about parsing through to the end of the input text. regards > Steven > > On Friday 04 February 2022 10:35:54 (+01:00), Dave Pawson wrote: > > > O Regan, Gonorill, your old kind father > > Whose franke heart gaue you all, O that way madnes lies, > > Let me shun that, no more of that. > > -Bill S > > > > When I compile a programming language program, > > I may get warnings, but (to me) the compile either > > succeeds or fails. > > > > I would hope that with an ixml grammar and input string > > I can rely on the same reasoning? Pass / fail (or pass, > > with warnings). From this I expect my vxml output to > > be complete, no 'missing bits'? > > > > I'm using a Saxon class implementation, so if it has a bug > > I can look for a blue moon. > > > > Is this assumption reasonable / agreed? > > > > > > > > regards > > > > > > > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Received on Friday, 4 February 2022 12:44:45 UTC