- From: Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 12:21:18 +0000
- To: Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com>
- Cc: Bethan Tovey-Walsh <accounts@bethan.wales>, ixml <public-ixml@w3.org>
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 at 12:13, Tom Hillman <tom@expertml.com> wrote: > > I don't think you are wrong, although I think that any parser is necessarily also a "recogniser": to "recognise" a piece of text, all you can really do is try to parse it and see if it succeeds... > > I suppose there may also be errors that are due to reasons other than the input not being a sentence in the grammar: we really ought to think about having some standard error codes. Request an agenda item for this Tues 8th telcon please regards > > _________________ > Tomos Hillman > eXpertML Ltd > +44 7793 242058 > On 4 Feb 2022, 12:00 +0000, Bethan Tovey-Walsh <accounts@bethan.wales>, wrote: > > I’m inclined to agree with Dave. I wouldn’t call it an error if the implementation were only a recogniser: it would make sense in that context for the outcomes “yes, this is a sentence” and “no, this is not a sentence” to be of (potentially) equal interest and value. But the point of the ixml parser is to provide vxml output, not to tell you whether your input string is a valid sentence or not. If it can’t provide that output, I’d call that an error. > > Happy to hear why I’m wrong, though; my instinctive understanding is sometimes way off base. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 4 Feb 2022, at 09:36, Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> wrote: > > O Regan, Gonorill, your old kind father > Whose franke heart gaue you all, O that way madnes lies, > Let me shun that, no more of that. > -Bill S > > When I compile a programming language program, > I may get warnings, but (to me) the compile either > succeeds or fails. > > I would hope that with an ixml grammar and input string > I can rely on the same reasoning? Pass / fail (or pass, > with warnings). From this I expect my vxml output to > be complete, no 'missing bits'? > > I'm using a Saxon class implementation, so if it has a bug > I can look for a blue moon. > > Is this assumption reasonable / agreed? > > > > regards > > > > > -- > Dave Pawson > XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. > Docbook FAQ. > > > -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Received on Friday, 4 February 2022 12:26:43 UTC