public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from August 2015 by subject

A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51

AW: Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec]

AW: Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed)

AW: reviewing the FPWD

Extending SHACL Core (was: Update and opportunities with SHACL)

ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity

ISSUE-51: Updated draft and proposal

ISSUE-58: Added sh:ignoredProperties to sh:ClosedShapeConstraint

ISSUE-64: Spec updated to include sh:minInclusive etc.

ISSUE-70: Proposed clean up of sh:defaultValueType

ISSUE-72: sh:qualifiedValueShape added to spec

ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false?

modelling using SHACL - a bad idea - ISSUE-23

my vote on ISSUE-70

nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65

probable regrets for Thursday

Properties v classes in validation

Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44

Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done

Proposal to close ISSUE-51 as specified in shacl-ref

proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension

RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 13 August 215

RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015

RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 20 August 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG [minutes] for 27 August 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 6 August 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015

RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 6 August 2015

Regrets

reviewing the FPWD

sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection

shapes-ACTION-28: Review http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/

shapes-ISSUE-74 (SPARQL endpoint support): Should SHACL support vallidating RDF graphs accessible via unmodified SPARQL endpoints [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-78 (sh:abstract): Should SHACL support marking classes as abstract [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-82 (Unique language): Shall SHACL Core include support for unique language constraints? [SHACL Spec]

shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec]

SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints

Update and opportunities with SHACL

Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch

Validation - positive results

what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed)

Last message date: Monday, 31 August 2015 23:13:24 UTC