public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from August 2015 by author

Arnaud Le Hors

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG [minutes] for 27 August 2015 (Friday, 28 August)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 (Thursday, 27 August)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 (Wednesday, 26 August)
• Re: Validation - positive results (Tuesday, 25 August)
• RDF Data Shapes Minutes for 20 August 2015 (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (Thursday, 20 August)
• RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (Wednesday, 19 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015 (Friday, 14 August)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015 (Thursday, 13 August)
• RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 13 August 215 (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Wednesday, 12 August)
• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Monday, 10 August)
• RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 6 August 2015 (Monday, 10 August)
• RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 6 August 2015 (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Tuesday, 4 August)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 (Monday, 31 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (Wednesday, 19 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015 (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-74 (SPARQL endpoint support): Should SHACL support vallidating RDF graphs accessible via unmodified SPARQL endpoints [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 6 August)

Axel Polleres

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)

Dimitris Kontokostas

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-51 as specified in shacl-ref (Monday, 3 August)
• proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension (Saturday, 1 August)

Holger Knublauch

• Re: Properties v classes in validation (Monday, 31 August)
• Re: ISSUE-51: Updated draft and proposal (Monday, 31 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 (Monday, 31 August)
• ISSUE-51: Updated draft and proposal (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (Wednesday, 26 August)
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (Wednesday, 26 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 24 August)
• ISSUE-70: Proposed clean up of sh:defaultValueType (Monday, 24 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection (Wednesday, 19 August)
• Re: sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection (Tuesday, 18 August)
• Re: nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) (Friday, 14 August)
• ISSUE-58: Added sh:ignoredProperties to sh:ClosedShapeConstraint (Friday, 14 August)
• ISSUE-72: sh:qualifiedValueShape added to spec (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Extending SHACL Core (was: Update and opportunities with SHACL) (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Monday, 10 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Saturday, 8 August)
• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 (Thursday, 6 August)
• ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-74 (SPARQL endpoint support): Should SHACL support vallidating RDF graphs accessible via unmodified SPARQL endpoints [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: modelling using SHACL - a bad idea - ISSUE-23 (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: modelling using SHACL - a bad idea - ISSUE-23 (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-51 as specified in shacl-ref (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Monday, 3 August)
• ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-51 as specified in shacl-ref (Monday, 3 August)
• Re: ISSUE-64: Spec updated to include sh:minInclusive etc. (Sunday, 2 August)

Irene Polikoff

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Monday, 10 August)

Jerven Tjalling Bolleman

• Re: shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 14 August)

John Walker

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)

Jose Emilio Labra Gayo

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG agenda for 27 August 2015 (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (Thursday, 20 August)

Karen Coyle

• Properties v classes in validation (Monday, 31 August)
• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity (Wednesday, 26 August)
• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity (Tuesday, 25 August)
• Validation - positive results (Tuesday, 25 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Monday, 10 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Saturday, 8 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Monday, 3 August)

Markus Lanthaler

• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Tuesday, 18 August)
• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Tuesday, 11 August)
• RE: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Monday, 10 August)

Martynas Jusevičius

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Friday, 7 August)

Miika Alonen

• sh:allowedValues and skos:Collection (Monday, 17 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] (Monday, 17 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)

Peter F. Patel-Schneider

• Re: RDF Data Shapes WG [minutes] for 27 August 2015 (Friday, 28 August)
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: my vote on ISSUE-70 (Wednesday, 26 August)
• my vote on ISSUE-70 (Wednesday, 26 August)
• probable regrets for Thursday (Wednesday, 26 August)
• reviewing the FPWD (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (Thursday, 20 August)
• Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015 (Wednesday, 19 August)
• Re: nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) (Friday, 14 August)
• what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) (Friday, 14 August)
• nomenclature in current document - ISSUE-65 (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? (Thursday, 6 August)
• Re: ISSUE-76: Can errors be treated as false? (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 (Wednesday, 5 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-32 as done (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Proposal to close ISSUE-3 and ISSUE-44 (Tuesday, 4 August)
• modelling using SHACL - a bad idea - ISSUE-23 (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: proposal to close ISSUE-75 with a result vocabulary extension (Tuesday, 4 August)
• A simpler proposal for reporting SHACL results - ISSUE-51 (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch (Tuesday, 4 August)
• Re: Updated proposal to close ISSUE-51 based on Turtle file in ISSUE-51 branch (Tuesday, 4 August)

Phil Archer

• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Wednesday, 12 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Monday, 10 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Friday, 7 August)
• Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Friday, 7 August)

RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker

• shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• shapes-ACTION-28: Review http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/ (Thursday, 20 August)
• shapes-ISSUE-82 (Unique language): Shall SHACL Core include support for unique language constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 19 August)
• shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Wednesday, 19 August)
• shapes-ISSUE-80 (Scheme URIs): Constraint to limit IRIs against scheme/namespace, possibly with dereferencing [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)
• shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)
• shapes-ISSUE-78 (sh:abstract): Should SHACL support marking classes as abstract [SHACL Spec] (Tuesday, 4 August)

Simon Steyskal

• Regrets (Thursday, 27 August)
• Re: ISSUE-51: Generalized sh:severity (Wednesday, 26 August)
• AW: Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-83 (multiple sh:qualifiedValueShapes): How should multiple definitions of sh:qualifiedValueShape of a property constraint be treated? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-81 (Property pair constraints): Shall SHACL Core include support for disjoint properties and other property pair constraints? [SHACL Spec] (Friday, 21 August)
• AW: reviewing the FPWD (Friday, 21 August)
• AW: Re: what is the proposal to publish? (I.e, what needs to be reviewed) (Friday, 14 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)
• Re: shapes-ISSUE-79 (Validation functions): Cleaner separation between value checking and property iteration [SHACL Spec] (Thursday, 13 August)

Simon.Cox@csiro.au

• RE: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Tuesday, 11 August)
• RE: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Monday, 10 August)
• RE: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints (Monday, 10 August)

Tom Johnson

• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Tuesday, 11 August)
• Re: Update and opportunities with SHACL (Monday, 10 August)

Last message date: Monday, 31 August 2015 23:13:24 UTC