- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 10:29:49 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 8/20/2015 10:18, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> ISSUE-65
> One problem with the current setup is the treatment of sh:valueShape. It
> appears that the scope and filter of the shape are both ignored, which seems
> to be wrong, but it also seems to be wrong to consider them. I think that it
> would be better to have sh:valueShape not be a shape but instead be a
> constraint. (Then I think that the names of shapes and constraints should be
> changed.)
A related question was raised by Dimitris a while back but got "postponed":
http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/49
I currently believe it should use sh:filterShape with sh:valueShape, but
the scope may indeed be ignored there.
Holger
Received on Thursday, 20 August 2015 00:30:23 UTC