Re: RDF Data Shapes Agenda for 20 August 2015

On 8/20/2015 10:18, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> ISSUE-65
> One problem with the current setup is the treatment of sh:valueShape.  It
> appears that the scope and filter of the shape are both ignored, which seems
> to be wrong, but it also seems to be wrong to consider them.  I think that it
> would be better to have sh:valueShape not be a shape but instead be a
> constraint.   (Then I think that the names of shapes and constraints should be
> changed.)

A related question was raised by Dimitris a while back but got "postponed":

I currently believe it should use sh:filterShape with sh:valueShape, but 
the scope may indeed be ignored there.


Received on Thursday, 20 August 2015 00:30:23 UTC