Re: SKOS concept scheme URIs as values for constraints

+1. Given that this is a very common requirement, but one with a lot of 
variants, even seeing a few examples of how it might be solved would be 
a step forward. A similar discussion [1] looked at how one might convey 
information about remote services and negotiate protocols or profiles. 
If SHACL fits in at any point in this workflow, it would be nice to know.


On 8/10/15 4:13 AM, wrote:
> But it is a genuine requirement, so I wonder if we could at least walk through how it might look if there were a suitable practice for publishing vocabularies and registers.

Karen Coyle
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Monday, 10 August 2015 19:05:33 UTC