my vote on ISSUE-70

• From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
• Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:15:26 -0700
• To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <55DE2C6E.8020000@gmail.com>

ISSUE-70: blank node default type

PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-70, by stating that sh:valueClass constraints do not
need special treatment of blank nodes, but that the implicit rdf:type triples
for certain blank nodes can be pre-computed by an engine whenever the user
requests validation of shape structures.



I don't understand this proposal.  Does it say that these constructs, and
similar ones, never need rdf:type triples (no special treatment)?  Or does it
say that type triples are needed for non-blank nodes that appear in these
constructs and that missing type triples for blank nodes that appear in these
constructs can be pre-computed somehow (special treatment)?

I'm OK with the former, but not with the latter.


peter

Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2015 21:15:56 UTC