- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:01:55 -0700
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I'm happy with closing this issue as being adequately addressed by the current draft documents. peter On 07/27/2015 04:52 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > I believe we have answered the questions raised by ISSUE 32 [1] already when > we adopted the current draft. SHACL consists of a core language plus one or > more extension languages. SPARQL is one of those extension languages, and we > decided to try to use SPARQL as much as possible to define the Core. > > Holger > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/32 >
Received on Tuesday, 4 August 2015 21:02:27 UTC