Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015

Minutes corrected.
Thanks.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - 
IBM Software Group


Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com> wrote on 08/14/2015 08:59:47 AM:

> From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
> To: Arnaud Le Hors/Cupertino/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
> Date: 08/14/2015 08:59 AM
> Subject: Re: RDF Data Shapes WG minutes for 13 August 2015
> 
> Arnaud,
> 
> Correction. The minutes contain the statement:
> 
> aryman: in shex they let you to specify more finegrained notions of
> closed shapes
> 
> What I said was:
> 
> aryman: in the ShEx-inspired Core SHACL Semantics [1] document they
> allow you to specify more finegrained notions of open shapes.
> 
> This is defined in the grammar rule:
> 
> OpenShape ::= 'open' InclPropSet? ShapeExpr
> 
> Here you supply an optional set of included properties that might
> appear in a graph. I believe that if you don't supply this set them
> the shape is completely open. If you do supply this set then the shape
> is semi-open, i.e. it's like a closed shape with vacuous constraints
> on the included properties, e.g. they are allowed on any node with
> cardinality "0 or Many".
> 
> [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/
> 
> -- Arthur
> 
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> 
wrote:
> > Available for review:
> > http://www.w3.org/2015/08/13-shapes-minutes.html
> > --
> > Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies 
- IBM
> > Software Group
> >
>