- From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:59:47 -0400
- To: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Arnaud, Correction. The minutes contain the statement: aryman: in shex they let you to specify more finegrained notions of closed shapes What I said was: aryman: in the ShEx-inspired Core SHACL Semantics [1] document they allow you to specify more finegrained notions of open shapes. This is defined in the grammar rule: OpenShape ::= 'open' InclPropSet? ShapeExpr Here you supply an optional set of included properties that might appear in a graph. I believe that if you don't supply this set them the shape is completely open. If you do supply this set then the shape is semi-open, i.e. it's like a closed shape with vacuous constraints on the included properties, e.g. they are allowed on any node with cardinality "0 or Many". [1] http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/semantics/ -- Arthur On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote: > Available for review: > http://www.w3.org/2015/08/13-shapes-minutes.html > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies - IBM > Software Group >
Received on Friday, 14 August 2015 16:00:16 UTC