xml-dist-app@w3.org from February 2001 by author

ajit deshmukh

• hello (Friday, 16 February)

Anne Thomas Manes

• RE: question (Thursday, 22 February)

Bob Cunnings

• Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Intermediaries and XML Protocol (Tuesday, 6 February)

Craig Tataryn

• Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion (Thursday, 1 February)
• Fwd: INT: Intermediary Discussion (Thursday, 1 February)

Daniel Barclay

• SOAP 1.1 Validator - predefined-entity counter questions (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Binary attachments to XP: or unipart vs. multipart (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure (Monday, 5 February)

Dave Winer

• Re: SOAP 1.1 Validator - predefined-entity counter questions (Friday, 9 February)
• First interop (Thursday, 8 February)
• Happy ending (Thursday, 8 February)
• Sun's use of "XML RPC" (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Announce: SOAP 1.1 Validator Web App (Friday, 2 February)

David Ezell

• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- comparison with SOAP1.1. (Wednesday, 7 February)

David Fallside

• Outputs of this working group? (Thursday, 8 February)
• SOAP DSIG Submission (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Clarification sought on DS805 and DS807 (Tuesday, 6 February)

Dennis Bosman

• question (Thursday, 22 February)

Dick Brooks

• FW: ebXML Technical Architecture Specification Approved (Wednesday, 28 February)
• FW: ebXML Integrates SOAP Into Messaging Services Spec (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)

Evan Ireland

• Comment on XML Protocol WG Issues List (Friday, 23 February)

Fabio Arciniegas A.

• Call For Papers - PDPTA'2001 / Session: XML and Distributed Applications (Friday, 2 February)

Floren Linda ICN EN HO SE 924

• Faultcodes: where to define? (Monday, 26 February)

George Moore

• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful (Monday, 26 February)

Glen Daniels

• Text for DS805 / DS807 in XML Protocol Requirements doc (Thursday, 22 February)
• DS807 (Wednesday, 14 February)
• DS805 (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: Clarification sought on DS805 and DS807 (Tuesday, 6 February)

Graham Klyne

• Re: FYI: APEX (Tuesday, 27 February)

Henrik Frystyk Nielsen

• RE: Comment on XML Protocol WG Issues List (Friday, 23 February)
• SOAP/1.1 issues list now maintained by the W3C XML Protocol Working Group (Thursday, 22 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries) (Wednesday, 7 February)

Henry Lowe

• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)

Hugo Haas

• 14 February teleconference minutes (Wednesday, 21 February)
• 7 February teleconference minutes (Thursday, 15 February)
• Jan 31, 2001 teleconference minutes (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Call for Participation: W3C Workshop on Web services (Saturday, 3 February)
• Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion (Thursday, 1 February)

James Snell

• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: ADDR: Addressing discussion (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Monday, 19 February)
• Re: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Monday, 19 February)

Jeffrey Kay

• [DS17] Rewrite of DS17 (Tuesday, 27 February)

John Daly

• RE: Namespaces in SOAP (Tuesday, 27 February)

John J. Barton

• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Thursday, 15 February)

John Scott

• RE: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure (Tuesday, 6 February)

john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com

• Re: [DS5] Request with acknowledgement - revised (Friday, 2 February)
• [DS8] Conversational message exchange - revised (Friday, 2 February)
• [DS7] Third part intermediary - revised (Friday, 2 February)

Ken MacLeod

• Re: Integrating XP Into Web Infrastructure (Tuesday, 6 February)

Lucas Gonze

• RE: ADDR: Addressing discussion (Monday, 12 February)

Marc Hadley

• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)

Marc J. Hadley

• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)

Mark Baker

• Re: Intermediaries and XML Protocol (Thursday, 8 February)

Mark Nottingham

• FYI: APEX (Monday, 26 February)
• NetGratus (Friday, 16 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: ADDR: Addressing discussion (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Monday, 12 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Intermediaries and XML Protocol (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries) (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Intermediaries and XML Protocol (Tuesday, 6 February)
• Re: Abstract Model and Intermediaries (Monday, 5 February)
• Re: XP->SOAP/1.1 requirement mappings for R8xx (Intermediaries) (Thursday, 1 February)

Martin Gudgin

• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• ADDR: Addressing discussion (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Sunday, 11 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Tuesday, 6 February)
• INT: Intermediary Discussion (Thursday, 1 February)

marwan sabbouh

• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: INT: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)

Mike Dierken

• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful (Wednesday, 28 February)
• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful (Monday, 26 February)
• RE: NetGratus (Friday, 23 February)

Mullins, Chalon

• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful (Wednesday, 28 February)

Narahari, Sateesh

• RE: text/xml for SOAP (and XP) considered harmful (Wednesday, 28 February)

Nilo Mitra (EUS)

• RE: [DS7] Third part intermediary - revised (Friday, 2 February)

Noah_Mendelsohn@lotus.com

• Re: Namespaces in SOAP (Wednesday, 28 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Thursday, 15 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Thursday, 8 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• Re: Correlating SOAP Requests/Responses - For Multiple Outstanding requests (Tuesday, 6 February)

Oisin Hurley

• RE: [SOAP] soap question (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: [SOAP] soap question (Thursday, 1 February)

Orchard, David

• RE: [SOAP] soap question (Friday, 9 February)

Oscar Pablo

• Namespaces in SOAP (Tuesday, 27 February)

Paul Cotton

• [R4xx] Application of XML Protocol Requirements to SOAP/1.1 (Wednesday, 7 February)

Paul Denning

• Re: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver. (Thursday, 1 February)

Paul Libbrecht

• XML-RPC political appearance (was Re: [xml-rpc] Sun's use of "XML RPC") (Wednesday, 7 February)

Pix823

• NEw Guy (Friday, 9 February)

Ray Denenberg

• Re: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. (Thursday, 15 February)
• Re: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. (Wednesday, 14 February)

Ray Whitmer

• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)

Rich Salz

• Re: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header concept? (Tuesday, 20 February)

Satish Thatte

• RE: first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header co ncept? (Tuesday, 20 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Thursday, 15 February)

Scott Cantor

• RE: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Thursday, 8 February)

Scott Isaacson

• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram (Friday, 9 February)
• INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Thursday, 1 February)
• Re: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver. (Thursday, 1 February)

Tom Harding

• XP (the 1999 version) (Sunday, 4 February)

Tom Miller

• Correlating SOAP Requests/Responses - For Multiple Outstanding requests (Tuesday, 6 February)

Williams, Stuart

• RE: first class support for flow/correlation/reply-with header co ncept? (Tuesday, 20 February)
• [AMG]: Notes from teleconference 15th February 2001 (Monday, 19 February)
• RE: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. (Friday, 16 February)
• RE: [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. (Thursday, 15 February)
• [AMG]: Revised Abstract Model draft document. (Wednesday, 14 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Tuesday, 13 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Monday, 12 February)
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: [AMG] : PPT of diagram (Friday, 9 February)
• [AMG] : PPT of diagram (Friday, 9 February)
• RE: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [AMG]: URLs for recent contributions. (Wednesday, 7 February)
• RE: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [AMG] 6th Feb 2001 Subgroup phone conference minutes available (Wednesday, 7 February)
• [AMG] Abstract Model and Intermediaries (Monday, 5 February)
• Minutes of AMG tele-conference 30th Jan 2001 (Friday, 2 February)
• RE: [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receive r. (Thursday, 1 February)
• [AMG]: Glossary terms: XP Processor, XP Sender and XP Receiver. (Thursday, 1 February)
• RE: [R3xx] Requirements Section "4.2 Simplicity and Stability" -- com parison with SOAP1.1. (Thursday, 1 February)

Yves Lafon

• RE: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: Thoughts about path and intermediaries (Wednesday, 14 February)
• Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion (Wednesday, 7 February)

Last message date: Wednesday, 28 February 2001 16:37:30 UTC