W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-dist-app@w3.org > February 2001

Re: INT: Re: Intermediary Discussion

From: Marc Hadley <marc@hadleynet.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 11:36:42 +0000 (GMT)
To: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
cc: XML Protocol Comments <xml-dist-app@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10102071112480.995-100000@bester>
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Martin Gudgin wrote:

> Open questions/issues...
> Do XP Intermediaries also sit between the sender of the response and the
> ultimate receiver of that response? And hence also process the response
> message assuming one exists.
One of the uses for an XP intermediary discussed in [1] is to act as an
inter-transport router (e.g. SMTP<-->HTTP). In this case the same
intermediary (or one with an equivalent inverse function) would need to be 
interposed for both request and response.

> If the answer to the above question is 'Yes' is the set of intermediaries
> the same for both the request and response message?
A further question relates to the ordering of intermediaries: is it 
reversed for responses ? i.e. if we have three intermediaries A, B and C and
the request path is ->A->B->C->, is the response path ->C->B->A ?


[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-app/2001Feb/0021.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2001 06:40:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 22:01:11 UTC