www-ws-desc@w3.org from April 2005 by author

Amelia A Lewis

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 13 April)

Anish Karmarkar

• Re: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have (Friday, 22 April)
• Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have (Thursday, 21 April)

Arthur Ryman

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 22 April)
• LC75m DONE (Friday, 22 April)
• Fwd: FW: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing Inline Schemas? (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Proposal for Resolution of LC99.: Message Reference Component is Underspecified (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Proposal for Resolution of LC99.: Message Reference Component is Underspecified (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Monday, 18 April)
• LC107 and Inconsistent Component Names (Monday, 18 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 15 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 15 April)
• Proposal for LC80: Contribution of Extensions to the Component Model (Wednesday, 13 April)
• RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: HTTP Binding example for the Primer (Saturday, 9 April)

Asir Vedamuthu

• RE: Proposal for LC80: Contribution of Extensions to the Componen t Model (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support (Wednesday, 13 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) (Monday, 4 April)

Bijan Parsia

• Probable regrets (Thursday, 14 April)

Charlton Barreto

• Re: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) (Monday, 4 April)
• Re: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) (Monday, 4 April)

David Booth

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 22 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 20 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• WSDL 2.0 Primer updated (Monday, 18 April)
• Re: More illumination? ( was RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import) (Saturday, 16 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Saturday, 16 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Saturday, 16 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 15 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Re: "Ambiguous" editorial action item (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service (Tuesday, 5 April)

David Orchard

• LC77a Namespaced elements and urlformencoded (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: LC54 Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: LC54 Proposal (Wednesday, 20 April)
• RE: Agenda, 21-22 April 2005 WS Desc FTF, Mountain View (Wednesday, 20 April)
• LC54 Proposal (Wednesday, 20 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Agenda, 15 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Agenda, 7 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" (Monday, 4 April)
• LC 47 proposed resolution (Saturday, 2 April)
• RE: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) (Friday, 1 April)
• Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Friday, 1 April)
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" (Friday, 1 April)
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" (Friday, 1 April)
• HTTP Binding example for the Primer (Friday, 1 April)

Gagnon, Stephane

• CFP: NYC WISE'05 Industry Track (Tuesday, 19 April)

Glen Daniels

• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• Compromise for formal objections (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service (Monday, 4 April)
• Primer text for F&P (Monday, 4 April)

Hugo Haas

• Bindings: what happens when {address} is absent? (Monday, 25 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Tuesday, 12 April)
• LC69b: support for multipart/related serialization in HTTP binding (Tuesday, 12 April)
• Re: Refrences editorial action item (Monday, 11 April)
• LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Friday, 8 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: working on part1 editorial action items (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• LC76d follow-up: difference between SOAP header blocks and SOAP modules (Thursday, 7 April)
• Re: LC69a: XForms comments on (WSDL) Version 2.0 Part 3: Bindings (a) (Friday, 1 April)

Jacek Kopecky

• Re: LC77a Namespaced elements and urlformencoded (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: LC54 Proposal (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: LC54 Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: LC54 Proposal (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: LC54 Proposal (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: LC 47 proposed resolution (Thursday, 14 April)

Jean-Jacques Moreau

• Re: Refrences editorial action item (Thursday, 14 April)
• Refrences editorial action item (Thursday, 7 April)
• "Ambiguous" editorial action item (Thursday, 7 April)

Joe Fialli

• Re: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have (Thursday, 21 April)

Jonathan Marsh

• Minutes, 28 April 2005 WS Description WG telcon (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Agenda, 28 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Agenda, 28 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Minutes, 21-22 April 2005 WS Description WG FTF (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Agenda, 21-22 April 2005 WS Desc FTF, Mountain View (Friday, 15 April)
• Minutes, 14 April 2005 WS Description telcon (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Agenda, 15 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 14 April)
• [draft] Agenda, 21-22 April 2005 WS Desc FTF, Mountain View (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Agenda, 15 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 13 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Wednesday, 13 April)
• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support (Wednesday, 13 April)
• Minutes, 7 April 2005 WSDescription WG telcon (Thursday, 7 April)
• Agenda, 7 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Consistency of WSDL Component property names (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)

Lawrence Mandel

• WSDL 2.0 Interface tests (Friday, 29 April)

Liu, Kevin

• Primer draft ready for review (Saturday, 30 April)
• Add link to Primer to do list in group web page (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: Agenda, 28 April 2005 WS Desc telcon (Wednesday, 27 April)
• Re: wsdl primer example uses POST to check availability? (Tuesday, 26 April)
• Primer section for MEP examples (Saturday, 23 April)
• RE: Primer text for F&P (Monday, 4 April)
• RE: HTTP Binding example for the Primer (Friday, 1 April)

Martin Gudgin

• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• More illumination? ( was RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import) (Saturday, 16 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Saturday, 16 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 15 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 13 April)

Matt Long

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Friday, 22 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)

Michael Salisbury

• RE: Yahoo! WebService WSDL (Tuesday, 5 April)

paul.downey@bt.com

• New Issue: Support of evolution of messages described in Schema 1.0 (Thursday, 14 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Friday, 8 April)
• Issue 107 - Schema for vector, matrix, array (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" (Tuesday, 5 April)
• RE: Primer Text for "Versioning and Service Equivalency" (Monday, 4 April)

Roberto Chinnici

• Re: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 21 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Wednesday, 20 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)

Rogers, Tony

• RE: Proposal for LC80: Contribution of Extensions to the Componen t Model (Tuesday, 26 April)
• RE: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support (Tuesday, 12 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)
• RE: Proposed resolution to LC 77a (Thursday, 7 April)

Ryan Betts

• Re: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)

Sanjiva Weerawarana

• proposal to add an {action} property to message and fault reference components (Thursday, 21 April)
• Fw: NEW ISSUE: use RDDL instead of XML Schema at the namespace URI? (Friday, 15 April)
• Re: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service (Saturday, 9 April)
• working on part1 editorial action items (Sunday, 3 April)

Srinivas, Davanum M

• RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support (Wednesday, 13 April)

Tom Jordahl

• Clarification Text for Last Call Issue 59d - wsdlLocation (Thursday, 28 April)
• RE: LC107 and Inconsistent Component Names (Monday, 18 April)
• RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service (Monday, 4 April)

Yalcinalp, Umit

• Clarification for wsdl:required attribute needed (Friday, 29 April)
• RE: Media-type note: new wordings to take into account the issue that schema mapping tools have (Thursday, 21 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Tuesday, 19 April)
• Proposed changes for Media Types Note (Saturday, 16 April)
• RE: Contradictions regarding transitivity of wsdl:import (Thursday, 14 April)

Last message date: Saturday, 30 April 2005 00:13:21 UTC