> 2005-03-10 > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0037/20050310-ws-desc-minutes.html#action06>: > Editors to check URI and schema references in Part 1. The URI reference seems to be OK. As far as I can see, we point to the latest[1] January 2005 RFC. As for XML Schema, we currently point to the 2 May 2001 recommendation[2]. Should we point instead to the 28 October 2004 recommendation[3], Second Edition? Is this what was meant by the action item? JJ. [1] http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 16:22:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:35 GMT