Re: LC77a Namespaced elements and urlformencoded

Dear all,

FWIW, I like any of the option 2 variants because I believe they are
closest to the original intent, and also hit the usefulness/simplicity
sweet point.

Best regards,

Jacek

On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 14:21 -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> Issue LC77a [1]
> 
>  
> 
> Proposals
> - Option 1: Status quo (broken?) (DaveO) [.2]
> 
> - Option 2: Ignore namespace prefix (DaveO) [.2]
> 
> - Option 2a: Require unique localNames (JM)
> 
> - Option 2b: Require single namespace
> 
> - Option 2c: Require names to be uniquely mappable to Qnames
> 
> - Option 3: Serialize QName (DaveO) [.2]
> 
> - Option 4: Disallow qualified elements (Asir) [.3]
> 
> - Option 5: Serialize namespace names (Hugo, DaveO) [.4], [.5]
> 
> - Option 6: Ignore namespace prefix if single namespace, else
> serialize with namespace name (DaveO) [.6]
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Dave
> 
>  
> 
> [.1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a
> 
> [.2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0005.html
> 
> [.3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0032.html
> 
> [.4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0050.html
> 
> [.5]
> http://www.pacificspirit.com/blog/2004/04/29/binding_qnames_to_uris
> 
> [.6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0141.html
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>