Re: Refrences editorial action item

* Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr> [2005-04-07 18:22+0200]
> 
> >2005-03-10 
> ><http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/att-0037/20050310-ws-desc-minutes.html#action06>: 
> >Editors to check URI and schema references in Part 1.
> 
> 
> The URI reference seems to be OK. As far as I can see, we point to the 
> latest[1] January 2005 RFC.
> 
> As for XML Schema, we currently point to the 2 May 2001 
> recommendation[2]. Should we point instead to the 28 October 2004 
> recommendation[3], Second Edition? Is this what was meant by the action 
> item?

Yes. I thought I had updated it actually, but we should indeed point
to the latest versions of Schema, XML, the Infoset, etc.

Cheers,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/