W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2005

RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:13:00 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A5072CF15A@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

It's not clear whether you are also proposing changing @uri and {uri} on f&p and soap:module as well.  I'm not sure the attribute and property name "iri" is going to be very user friendly.  We might want to consider renaming this attribute to something neutral.

Appendix E (which should be moving to a Note any day now) defines some specific namespace URIs, I would worry about calling those namespace IRIs (since the Namespaces in XML 1.0 spec doesn't), so I would not necessarily extend the search and replace to this content.

In the Adjuncts spec section 4.11.2 it talks about the 'URI "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/bindings/HTTP/"'.  It is indeed a URI and I don't think we should change to IRI here.  (See [1] for rationale.)

I also point out that this would change "URI Style" to "IRI Style" and we might want to modify the associated URI "http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@/wsdl/style/uri".  The other interactions with the HTTP binding look OK to me but turning an expert eye there would probably be wise to make sure we don't call something an IRI when we're referring to something HTTP defines as a URI.

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing-comments/2005Apr/0007.html
________________________________________
From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Srinivas, Davanum M
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 7:32 AM
To: Rogers, Tony; Arthur Ryman; Hugo Haas
Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Subject: RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support

same with WS-Addressing...


-----Original Message-----
From:   www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Rogers, Tony
Sent:   Tue 4/12/2005 7:15 PM
To:     Arthur Ryman; Hugo Haas
Cc:     www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
Subject:        RE: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support

Absolutely - we had to explore this for the UDDI spec. anyURI already accepts IRIs.

Tony Rogers

        -----Original Message-----
        From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org on behalf of Arthur Ryman
        Sent: Wed 13-Apr-05 5:48
        To: Hugo Haas
        Cc: www-ws-desc@w3.org; www-ws-desc-request@w3.org
        Subject: Re: LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support
       
       

        Hugo,
       
        Can we use xs:anyURI for IRI's?
       
        Arthur Ryman,
        Rational Desktop Tools Development
       
        phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
        assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
        fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
        mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: 4169395063@fido.ca
        intranet: http://labweb.torolab.ibm.com/DRY6/
       
       
       
Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Sent by: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org

04/08/2005 08:27 AM

To
www-ws-desc@w3.org
cc
Subject
LC74a: Proposed resolution for IRI support     

               




        As I was looking about IRI support in our spec, I stumbled upon open
        issue LC74a[1] which asks for it too.
       
        I'd therefore like to propose the following resolution to close issue
        LC74a now that the IRI spec is a RFC:
        - s/URI/IRI/ in our spec
        - replace the the RFC 3986 reference by an RFC 3987
       
        That should take care of it.
       
        Cheers,
       
        Hugo
       
         1. http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/#LC74a
        --
        Hugo Haas - W3C
        mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
       
       
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 16:13:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:35 GMT