RE: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service

Hi Tom,

I'm in favor of calling a spade a spade, and it *is* a limitation -- you
even used the word "limit" yourself!  But okay, I'll soften it a bit as
you suggest, as I certainly *don't* mean to be implying that WSDL 2.0 is
lame.

Thanks for the suggestion.


On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:57, Tom Jordahl wrote:
> David,
> 
> I would really prefer this section not to be phrased in terms of a
> "limitation".
> 
> For instance:
>   "How can service providers work around this limitation?"
> Change to:
>   "How can service providers indicate a relationship between services?"
> 
> And
>   "With that caveat in mind, potential workarounds include:"
> Change to:
>   "With that caveat in mind, potential strategies include:"
> 
> In general, this section feels like you are pointing out how lame we
> were to not include this feature in the spec.  Rather it should be
> presented as we had good reason to limit the wsdl:service to a single
> interface and here are some good ideas on how WSDL authors can indicate
> related services.
> 
> --
> Tom Jordahl
> Macromedia Server Development
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: www-ws-desc-request@w3.org [mailto:www-ws-desc-request@w3.org]
> On
> > Behalf Of David Booth
> > Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2005 11:46 AM
> > To: www-ws-desc@w3.org
> > Subject: Text for primer re: Multiple Interfaces for the Same Service
> > 
> > 
> > Per my work item:
> > [[
> > 5. Primer [.1]
> >    + Section 7.4 Multiple Logical WSDL Documents Describing the
> >                  Same Service (David)
> > ]]
> > I've put a draft of this section into the current editor's draft:
> > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-
> > primer.html#adv-multiple-docs-describing-same-service
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > 
> > David Booth
> > W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
> > 
-- 

David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 05:00:56 UTC