W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2005

Agenda, 21-22 April 2005 WS Desc FTF, Mountain View

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:51:36 -0700
Message-ID: <7DA77BF2392448449D094BCEF67569A507379195@RED-MSG-30.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: <www-ws-desc@w3.org>

Logistics [1] and dial-in details [2]
[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/Logistics-2005-04-21.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0023.html

------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday 21 April
------------------------------------------------------------------

08:00 Check-in and vehicle registration

09:00 Opening formalities
    a. Introductions & logistics
    b. Assign scribes:
       Youenn Fablet, Umit Yalcinalp, Jean-Jacques Moreau, 
       Rebecca Bergersen, Anish Karmarkar, Jeff Mischkinsky,
       Charlton Barreto, Arthur Ryman, Asir Vedamuthu, Amy Lewis
    c. Action Item [3] Review:
       ?* 2004-11-09: DaveO will recast the @compatibleWith proposal 
                      using an extension namespace. (LC54),
                      due 2005-04-13.
       ?* 2004-11-10: Glen will post an e-mail describing the compromise
                      proposal on formal objections, due 2005-04-11. 
       ?* 2004-11-10: Sanjiva will write up this proposal and email it 
                      to the list as a response to the objection, 
                      due 2005-04-20.
       ?* 2004-11-11: Anish to propose additions to the test suite for 
                      the purpose of interoperability testing, 
                      due 2005-04-13.
       ?* 2004-12-03: Glen and Asir to help craft the specfic text for
                      the editors (LC18), due 2005-04-13.
       ?* 2005-03-10: Bijan will look at item Editors to move App C to
                      RDF Mapping spec to see if it is still relavant, 
                      due 2005-04-13.
       ?* 2005-03-24: Roberto to draft proposal to split HTTP binding 
                      into 3 bindings, due 2005-04-20. 
       ?* 2005-03-31: Paul to raise issue for extensibility/versioning 
                      for wsdl using schema 1.0, due 2005-04-13. 
        ? 2005-03-31: Marsh to take on (or recommend closing) Bijan's AI
                      to produce a component/property table via XSLT, 
                      due 2005-04-28.
       ?* 2005-03-31: Kevin to fix editorial POST/GET and safety edits,
                      due 2005-04-13. 
     DONE 2005-04-14: Marsh to put RDF mapping on the agenda for next 
                      week, due 2005-04-15. 
       ?* 2005-04-14: Arthur to evaluate text from Amy on 
                      schemaLocation, due 2005-04-21. 
       ?* 2005-04-14: DaveO to summarize LC77a options, due 2005-04-21. 
       ?* 2005-04-14: Arthur to present a new proposal for LC99, 
                      due 2005-04-21.

 [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/#actions

09:30 Primer [4] next steps

 [4]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-primer.ht
ml

09:45 WSDL Schedule
    - Dependency from WS-Addressing
    - Dependency from WS-Chor
    - Repub to sync with Primer?
    - Raise issue on namespace document (RDDL)? [5]

 [5] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0086.html

10:00 RDF Mapping update (if applicable)

10:05 Common schema structures [6] (PaulD)
 
 [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0025.html

10:15 Media Type Description Note
    - Issues [7]
    - Larry's response to Issue 268 [8]
    - Joe Fialli has three comments [9]
    - I18N re-review [10]
    - Pub plan?

 [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/2/06/issues.html#detailList
 [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0063.html
 [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Mar/0017.html
[10]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-i18n-core/2005Mar/0015.html
 
10:40 Break

11:00 Issue LC74a: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (a) [11]
    - URI vs. IRI
    - Proposal [12]
    - xs:anyURI issue? (Asir) [13]
    - Amended proposal (Jonathan) [14]

[11] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74a
[12] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0044.html
[13] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0054.html
[14] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0057.html

11:15 RPC issues
    - Issue LC75g: RPC should allow element wildcards [15]
      + Proposal (Roberto) [16]
    - Issue LC75f: RPC Allow extension attributes on RPC local element
                   children [17]
    - Issue LC118: New Issue RPC Style (and proposed fix) [18]
 
[15] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75g
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0038.html
[17] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75f
[18] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC118

12:00 Lunch

13:00 Import issues
    - Issue LC120: Contradictions regarding transitivity of 
                   wsdl:import [19]
	 + Thread [20]
    - Issue LC89m: Clarify "directly include" [21]
    - Issue LC96: wsdl:import semantics is different from xs:import [22]
    - Arthur's import test cases [23]
    - Issue LC74: Idle question [24]
    - Issue LC75w: Allow non-dereferencable includes [25]
    - Issue LC116: Is schemaLocation Required When Importing 
                   Inline Schemas? [26]
    - Issue LC59d: Clarify wsdlLocation [27]

[19] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC120
[20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0059.html 
[21] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89m
[22] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC96
[23] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-ws-desc/2005Apr/0028.html 
[24] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC74
[25] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75w 
[26] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC116 
[27] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC59d 

15:00 Break

15:20 Component issues
    - Issue LC99: Message Reference Component is Underspecified [28]
      + Proposal (Arthur) [29]
    - Issue LC80: Extension Components are not Described [30]
      + Proposal (Arthur) [31]
    - Issue LC59e: Clarify serialization [32]
    - Issue LC75m: Inconsistent value for {operation reference} [33]
    - Issue LC89f: Strengthen conformance re: syntax [34]

[28] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC99
[29] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Mar/0115.html 
[30] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC80
[31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0056.html
[32] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC59e
[33] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC75m
[34] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89f

17:30 Adjourn

------------------------------------------------------------------
Friday 22 April
------------------------------------------------------------------
09:00 Issue LC54: WSDL Last Call issue [40]
    - Awaiting DaveO's further action to cast @compatibleWith as an
      extension

[40] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC54

09:30 HTTP
    - Issue LC77a: Namespaced elements and urlformencoded [41]
      + "Serialization as 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' does
        not ... explain how namespaced elements are to be serialized."
      + Option 1: Status quo (broken?) (DaveO) [42]
      + Option 2: Ignore namespace prefix (DaveO) [42]
      + Option 3: Serialize QName (DaveO) [42]
      + Option 4: Disallow qualified elements (Asir) [43]
      + Option 5: Serialize namespace names (Hugo) [44]
      + Other options from DaveO (TBD)
    - Issue LC110: WSDL 2.0 Part3, Sec. 3.4 [45]

[41] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC77a
[42] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0005.html
[43] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0032.html
[44] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Apr/0050.html
[45] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC110

10:30 Break

10:50 MEP issues
    - Issue LC76a: MEPs should support addressing mechanism [46]
    - Issue LC76b: Define "propogate" [47]
    - Issue LC79: Make sure in-only mep is supported in wsdl 
                  soap12 binding [48]
    - Issue LC102: What is the SOAP MEP for In-only [49]
    - Issue LC114: In-Multi-Out MEP [was "WSDL 2.0 specification"] [50]

[46] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76a
[47] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76b
[48] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC79
[49] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC102
[50] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC114

12:00 Lunch

13:00 F&P issues
    - Issue LC59f: Support compositors [51]
    - Issue LC89d: Disabling a feature on a specific operation [52]
    - Issue LC89e: Properties are runtime and shouldn't be in WSDL [53]

[51] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC59f
[52] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89d
[53] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89e

15:00 Break

15:20 Schema-related issues
    - Issue LC62a: issues with wsdl:endpoint@address (a) [54]
    - Issue LC89a: Clarify schema validity conformance requirement [55]
    - Issue LC89h: Use XML Schema, not pseudo-schema [56]
    - Issue LC100: The WSDL 2.0 XSD for Root Element is Too Loose [57]
    - Issue LC117: Problem with Service References: elementFormDefault=
                   "qualified" prevents restriction [58]

[54] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC62a
[55] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89a
[56] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC89h
[57] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC100
[58] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC117

16:30 Quick survey of remaining issues [59]
    - Issue LC52c: Last call review comments (c)
    - Issue LC61c: comments on the wsdl 2.0 working drafts (c)
    - Issue LC62b: issues with wsdl:endpoint@address (b)
    - Issue LC64: URI References for Schema Components
    - Issue LC71: default interface/operation/@pattern
    - Issue LC72: Faults that are not described in WSDL?
    - Issue LC74b: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (b)
    - Issue LC74c: I18N Comments, WSDL 2.0 Part I (partial) (c)
    - Issue LC75c: Remove {safety} property
    - Issue LC75d: Require explicit type for each input/output?
    - Issue LC75j: {safety} has a default, @safety doesn't
    - Issue LC75o: Remove "if any" from Table 2-13
    - Issue LC75p: Make address a binding-specific extension
    - Issue LC75x: Complete or remove App D
    - Issue LC82: Operation Name Mapping Requirement Bug
    - Issue LC84c: Operation Name Mapping Requirement doesn't go 
                   far enough
    - Issue LC89j: Use namespaces to avoid local-name conflicts
    - Issue LC90: XML Schema comment on WSDL 2.0
    - Issue LC98: {soap mep} property and SOAP 1.1 Binding
    - Issue LC101: message level binding?

[59]
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html?view=normal&exper
t=1&editorial=1&stateAgreed=1&stateDeclined=1&stateSubsumed=1

17:30 Adjourn
Received on Friday, 15 April 2005 19:52:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:35 GMT