W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2005

RE: LC54 Proposal

From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek.kopecky@deri.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 12:25:15 +0200
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: WS-Description WG <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1114165515.3207.6.camel@Kalb>

Dave, one more thing:

On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 15:31 -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> > BTW, what happened to the original intention (caught in the issue) of
> > indicating compatibility on interfaces as opposed to services? If you
> > want to go in this direction, wouldn't starting at interface be
> cleaner?
> > 
> I think the group ended up saying that an interface extension is a
> compatible extension.  

Is a text to this effect going to end up in the specification? Are there
minutes out there that reflect the group saying this?

Best regards,

Received on Friday, 22 April 2005 10:26:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:35 GMT