W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-desc@w3.org > April 2005

Re: "Ambiguous" editorial action item

From: David Booth <dbooth@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:14:15 -0400
To: Jean-Jacques Moreau <jean-jacques.moreau@crf.canon.fr>
Cc: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, WSD Public <www-ws-desc@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1112894055.3990.183.camel@nc6000.w3.org>

Yes, I believe this was resolved, and the editorial action is no longer
applicable.


On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 11:47, Jean-Jacques Moreau wrote:
> Jonathan,
> 
> I've tracked down the ambiguous editorial action item, described as:
>      "2004-11-10: Editor remove ambiguity if it exists"
> 
> This has to do with the "Unique GED" objection[1], and David Booth's 
> proposal[2], more particularly his summary slide[3].
> 
> David seemed to be saying that the (at the time) exisitng operation name 
> mapping requirements was worded ambiguously.
> 
> I haven't followed this issue very closely, but has it not been solved 
> since the comment was made?
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> [1] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2004Nov/0038.html>
> [2] <http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/1110-dbooth-opname/>
> [3] <http://www.w3.org/2004/Talks/1110-dbooth-opname/slide25-0.html>
-- 

David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Received on Thursday, 7 April 2005 17:14:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:58:35 GMT