public-web-plugins@w3.org from August 2003 by date

Monday, 1 September 2003

• Do you think this is covered by the Patent? Hector Santos

Sunday, 31 August 2003

• Re: Background information on Mr. Wei Pei Hector Santos
• Re: IE Thread Ed Millard
• RE: IE Thread Ryan A. Missman - RSM
• Re: What a prior art product must do Ed Millard
• Interesting article from 1995 about the Eolas patent Richard M. Smith
• Background information on Mr. Wei Pei Richard M. Smith
• University of Calif. Q&A on the Eolas/Microsoft lawsuit Richard M. Smith
• RE: What a prior art product must do Scott Cadillac
• RE: What a prior art product must do Richard M. Smith
• Re: Flash Robin Berjon
• RE: What a prior art product must do Scott Cadillac
• Re: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft Jake Robb
• Re: [public-web-plugins] <none> SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• RE: [public-web-plugins] <none> Richard M. Smith
• [public-web-plugins] <none> Peter Greenwood
• RE: What a prior art product must do Richard M. Smith

Saturday, 30 August 2003

• Re: Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas Ross Chappell

Sunday, 31 August 2003

• Re: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft William Warren
• Question about idea SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• RE: What a prior art product must do Scott Cadillac
• Re: What a prior art product must do SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• Re: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft Jake Robb
• Re: What a prior art product must do Jake Robb
• Re: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft Nicholas Chase
• RE: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft Richard M. Smith
• From how I see it B.Connolly
• RE: Comprehensive Summary of the Issues? Scott Cadillac
• Re: Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft Dag Wieers

Saturday, 30 August 2003

• Why a license deal is ONLY good for Microsoft Nicholas Chase
• Fw: What a prior art product must do Hector Santos
• Re: Prior Art Hector Santos
• Re: Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• Re: What a prior art product must do SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• RE: Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas Richard M. Smith
• Re: Prior Art Hector Santos
• Re: Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• RE: Prior Art Richard M. Smith
• RE: What a prior art product must do Richard M. Smith
• RE: Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas Richard M. Smith
• Re: What a prior art product must do Hector Santos
• RE: Prior Art Richard M. Smith
• Re: Prior Art Hector Santos
• What a prior art product must do Richard M. Smith
• Re: Prior Art Hector Santos
• Re: Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas Hector Santos
• RE: Prior Art Richard M. Smith
• RE: Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas Richard M. Smith
• RE: The other Internet patent case that Microsoft can loose Samuel Neff
• Re: Comprehensive Summary of the Issues? Rui Carmo
• Prior Art Hector Santos
• Microsoft should just do a license deal with Eolas Richard M. Smith
• RE: Comprehensive Summary of the Issues? Scott Cadillac
• Comprehensive Summary of the Issues? Rui Carmo
• Re: Prior Art Jacek Gancarson
• Prior Art George Bray
• The other Internet patent case that Microsoft can loose Richard M. Smith
• Re: Flash Dag Wieers

Friday, 29 August 2003

• Re: Flash Thomas Westin
• RE: Flash Dag Wieers
• RE: Flash Aral Balkan
• RE: Flash Aral Balkan
• Re: Flash Craig Babcock
• RE: Appeal will follow Scott Cadillac
• RE: Appeal will follow Richard M. Smith
• RE: Appeal will follow Stolowitz, Micah
• RE: Flash David Judd
• RE: Potential Partial Solution William Warren
• Security issues with browser plugins Richard M. Smith
• Flash Aral Balkan
• RE: Potential Partial Solution Scott Cadillac
• Re: Potential Partial Solution SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• Re: Potential Partial Solution Jake Robb
• Informative links Jake Robb
• Re: Potential Partial Solution SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• RE: Potential Partial Solution Scott Cadillac
• RE: potential impact Roland Lindsey
• potential impact W. Frederick Zimmerman, Isciences LLC
• Re: Potential Partial Solution Jake Robb
• RE: Potential Partial Solution Scott Cadillac
• Re: Potential Partial Solution SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• Re: Implications of eolas verdict Jake Robb
• RE: Technical Report of the Ad-hoc Meeting Scott Cadillac
• Re: Potential Partial Solution Jake Robb
• Potential Partial Solution SerpentMage (Christian Gross)
• what specific changes contemplated? W. Frederick Zimmerman, Isciences LLC
• Re: Implications of eolas verdict Robin Berjon
• RE: Implications of eolas verdict Hemant Desai
• Re: Implications of eolas verdict Orlando Echevarria
• Implications of eolas verdict Hemant Desai
• Re: Mixed namespaces Robin Berjon
• Re: Mixed namespaces Philipp Hoschka
• Re: Mixed namespaces Robin Berjon
• RE: [public-web-plugins] <none> McMichael, Justin
• Mixed namespaces (was: Re: [public-web-plugins] <none> Philipp Hoschka
• Re: [public-web-plugins] <none> Robin Berjon
• Technical Report of the Ad-hoc Meeting Antoine Quint
• Welcome again;-) Jacek Gancarson

Thursday, 28 August 2003

• [public-web-plugins] <none> Dag Wieers

Wednesday, 27 August 2003

• Report of W3C AdHoc Meeting, 19 August 2003, San Francisco, CA, USA Janet Daly
• New Public mailing list - public-web-plugins Simon J. Hernandez

Last message date: Sunday, 31 August 2003 21:19:04 UTC