Friday, 27 April 2007
Tuesday, 24 April 2007
Monday, 23 April 2007
Friday, 20 April 2007
Tuesday, 17 April 2007
Monday, 16 April 2007
Friday, 13 April 2007
Wednesday, 11 April 2007
Tuesday, 10 April 2007
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Jon Hanna
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Elliotte Harold
- RE: Option 1 - HTTP 303 Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs Booth, David (HP Software - Boston)
- Re: Option 1 - HTTP 303 Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs Richard Cyganiak
- Re: Option 1 - HTTP 303 Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs Alan Ruttenberg
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Henry S. Thompson
- Re: Option 1 - HTTP 303 Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs Richard Cyganiak
- Re: Option 1 - HTTP 303 Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs Chimezie Ogbuji
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Karl Dubost
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Karl Dubost
- Re: Option 1 - HTTP 303 Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs Alan Ruttenberg
- Re: Option 1 - HTTP 303 Re: Towards a TAG consideration of CURIEs Richard Cyganiak
Monday, 9 April 2007
Saturday, 7 April 2007
Friday, 6 April 2007
Thursday, 5 April 2007
Wednesday, 4 April 2007
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Soliciting comments on proposed namespace document for MTOM Policy Assertion 1.0 Namespace document noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) John Cowan
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Elliotte Harold
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Elliotte Harold
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Mark Baker
- RE: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) David Orchard
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Mark Baker
Tuesday, 3 April 2007
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- RE: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Pat Hayes
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Hannes Ledl / LEDL & PARTNER
- RE: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) David Orchard
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Shane McCarron
- RE: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Dave Pawson
- RE: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) David Orchard
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Mark Baker
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Henry S. Thompson
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Dave Pawson
- Re: Versioning Finding Updated John Cowan
- Re: should CSS, HTML, etc. documents bear version information? (XMLVersioning-41?) Mark Baker
Monday, 2 April 2007
Sunday, 1 April 2007
Last message date: Friday, 27 April 2007 17:36:56 UTC