- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 14:10:47 -0500
- To: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
- CC: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>, Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, www-tag@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, public-xg-mmsem@w3.org, newsml-g2@yahoogroups.com
John Cowan wrote: > 3) "123456" can't be the value of an attribute of type ID in a > *valid* XML document: true. However, plenty of documents are not > valid: in particular, any document without a DTD is not valid, and > there is nothing wrong with having a DTD without expecting or requiring > validity. > I guess... however, note that XHTML family documents are REQUIRED to be valid. That was the IPTC's goal when they started this thing. Not sure if it is still their goal... defining a syntax that breaks the rules would seem misguided to me. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2007 19:13:19 UTC