- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 01:20:13 -0400
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
I wonder if we're talking about the same "version" here, so I'll ask a clarifying question; if the document self-identified as, say, HTML 4 Strict instead of 3.2, what would that be useful for? Mark. On 4/4/07, David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> wrote: > In the case that was raised, I'd say that it was a bit more than what > Noah mentioned. I'd say that HTML is *the* key vocabulary as it's the > container, and knowing it's version is truly useful. Knowing it's HTML > as the "root" of a compound document is more interesting than knowing > it's HTML as part of a compound document - one example being WS-RP > messages which are SOAP messages containing HTML for portals.
Received on Wednesday, 4 April 2007 05:20:16 UTC