www-html@w3.org from November 2003 by date

Thursday, 27 November 2003

• Re: [XHTML2] Linktype 'redirect' and an idea for a finer grained version of it Ernest Cline

Tuesday, 25 November 2003

• comments wer yuo
• comments wer yuo
• comments wer yuo

Monday, 24 November 2003

• searching for partner sherine samy
• YOUR FREE LOTTERY TICKETS money@jimmoney.com
• RE: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Ernest Cline
• RE: Type Attribute Ernest Cline
• AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl

Sunday, 23 November 2003

• RE: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Ernest Cline

Saturday, 22 November 2003

• AW: AW: Type Attribute Oskar Welzl
• AW: AW: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• AW: Type Attribute Oskar Welzl

Friday, 21 November 2003

• War. Guerra thenausea
• The case against <noscript> (was: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts) Ernest Cline
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Lachlan Hunt
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Toby A Inkster
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Toby A Inkster

Thursday, 20 November 2003

• Re: Cite David Woolley
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts David Woolley
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Ernest Cline
• XHTML R. Holman
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Ernest Cline
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Lachlan Hunt
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• IPsmarx Technologies Inc. Canada IPsmarx Technologies
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Toby A Inkster
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 19 November 2003

• Re: Converting between XHTML 1 and XHTML 2 with XSLT David Woolley

Thursday, 20 November 2003

• Re: Cite fantasai
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Ernest Cline
• Re: Postings to www-html@w3.org reported as spam at spamcop? Jeremy Rand

Wednesday, 19 November 2003

• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Robert Koberg
• Postings to www-html@w3.org reported as spam at spamcop? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• [www-html] <none> service
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Lachlan Hunt
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Robert Koberg
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Type Attribute Lachlan Hunt
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Lachlan Hunt
• Re: AW: Type Attribute Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Converting between XHTML 1 and XHTML 2 with XSLT Jens Meiert
• Re: Converting between XHTML 1 and XHTML 2 with XSLT David Woolley
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Lachlan Hunt

Tuesday, 18 November 2003

• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: AW: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Cite Lanny Heidbreder
• Re: Cite Karl Dubost
• Re: Converting between XHTML 1 and XHTML 2 with XSLT Jeremy Rand
• Re: Cite David Woolley
• AW: Type Attribute Oskar Welzl
• Re: Converting between XHTML 1 and XHTML 2 with XSLT David Woolley
• Cite roderick.timberlake@btinternet.com
• Re: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Andy Holmes
• AW: AW: Type Attribute Oskar Welzl
• AW: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• RE: <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Ernest Cline
• <link> vs. <script> for external scripts Andy Holmes
• Re: Type Attribute Ernest Cline
• Re: Converting between XHTML 1 and XHTML 2 with XSLT Karl Dubost
• Re: Type Attribute Lachlan Hunt
• RE: AW: Type Attribute Ernest Cline

Monday, 17 November 2003

• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• AW: Type Attribute Oskar Welzl
• AW: Type Attribute (was: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type) Oskar Welzl
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Ernest Cline
• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Ernest Cline
• Re: Start HTML doc without HTML tag - was: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances Christoph Päper
• Re: Start HTML doc without HTML tag J. King
• Start HTML doc without HTML tag - was: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances Chris Moschini
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Scripting DTD's Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Scripting DTD Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Scripting DTD's Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Friday, 14 November 2003

• Re: Scripting DTD's Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Monday, 17 November 2003

• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Type Attribute Ernest Cline
• Re: Type Attribute David Woolley
• Re: Type Attribute Ernest Cline

Sunday, 16 November 2003

• lvg Michael
• Re: Type Attribute (was: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting Ernest Cline

Saturday, 15 November 2003

• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting Ernest Cline
• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting Stefan Ram
• AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Oskar Welzl
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Scripting DTD's Ernest Cline
• Re: Scripting DTD's David Woolley
• Re: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances AaronEldreth@cs.com
• Re: Scripting DTD's ReedMon29@aol.com
• Re: Scripting DTD's Ian Hickson
• Re: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances David Woolley
• Re: Scripting DTD's David Woolley
• Re: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances AaronEldreth@cs.com
• Re: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances AaronEldreth@cs.com
• Scripting DTD AaronEldreth@cs.com

Friday, 14 November 2003

• Re: Scripting DTD's Chris Moschini
• Re: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances David Woolley
• Re: More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances Andy Holmes
• Re: Scripting DTD's Andy Holmes

Thursday, 13 November 2003

• You are pretty, baby Randy Kobinski

Friday, 14 November 2003

• Re: Scripting DTD's David Woolley
• More language tags would solve a lot of annoyances ReedMon29@aol.com
• Re: Scripting DTD's Ernest Cline
• Scripting DTD AaronEldreth@cs.com
• AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• Re: Scripting DTD's AaronEldreth@cs.com
• Re: Scripting DTD's Chris Moschini
• AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Oskar Welzl
• Re: Scripting DTD's Wingnut
• Re: Scripting DTD's Ernest Cline
• Re: Scripting DTD's Lachlan Hunt
• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Ernest Cline
• Re: Scripting DTD's AaronEldreth@cs.com
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christoph Päper
• Re: Scripting DTD's Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Scripting DTD's Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Scripting DTD's AaronEldreth@cs.com
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Thursday, 13 November 2003

• Converting between XHTML 1 and XHTML 2 with XSLT Jeremy Rand
• AW: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Ernest Cline
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Ernest Cline
• Re: AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: FW: Re: [XHTML2] Linktype 'redirect' and an idea for a finer grained version of it David Woolley
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type David Woolley
• Re: FW: Re: [XHTML2] Linktype 'redirect' and an idea for a finer grained version of it David Woolley
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Lachlan Hunt
• RE: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Ernest Cline

Wednesday, 12 November 2003

• AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Oskar Welzl
• XHTML 2.0 and hreflang and type Ernest Cline
• AW: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• FW: Re: [XHTML2] Linktype 'redirect' and an idea for a finer grained version of it Ernest Cline
• Re: [XHTML2] Linktype 'redirect' and an idea for a finer grained version of it David Woolley

Tuesday, 11 November 2003

• [XHTML2] Linktype 'redirect' and an idea for a finer grained version of it Ernest Cline

Monday, 10 November 2003

• Re: Linktypes Start and Index Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Tuesday, 11 November 2003

• AW: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• Re: Linktypes Start and Index J. King

Monday, 10 November 2003

• Re: Linktypes Start and Index Gustaf Liljegren
• rlpaxa Matthew
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Linktypes Start and Index Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Christian Wolfgang Hujer

Sunday, 9 November 2003

• ***Payment Notification*** 800 Network System
• Re: <l>: Inline or Block? Ernest Cline
• Re: Linktypes Start and Index David Woolley
• Linktypes Start and Index Gustaf Liljegren
• Re: <l>: Inline or Block? Lachlan Hunt
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Ernest Cline
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Lachlan Hunt

Saturday, 8 November 2003

• batteries sales@photoserve.net
• Re: [OT] XHTML and form elements David Woolley
• batteries sales@photoserve.net

Thursday, 5 September 2002

• re:html format bab

Friday, 7 November 2003

• RE: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Jewett, Jim J
• Re: XHTML and form elements Emlyn Addison
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• titlelang (was:: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang) Ernest Cline
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 6 November 2003

• Re: XHTML and form elements Toby A Inkster
• Regarding Unsubscribing from group Manoj Varghese thomas
• XHTML and form elements Emlyn Addison
• [update3] 2003 movies Paul Brand
• Referencing System (The <cite> Element:) Lachlan Hunt

Wednesday, 5 November 2003

• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 David Woolley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer William F Hammond
• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: The <h> and <section> elements Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 <datetime> element proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0 <datetime> element proposal Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Upper limits of HTML Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Upper limits of HTML isjwoo@ust.hk

Tuesday, 4 November 2003

• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 Chris Moschini

Wednesday, 5 November 2003

• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Lachlan Hunt

Tuesday, 4 November 2003

• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Steven Pemberton
• RE: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Ernest Cline
• Re: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Lachlan Hunt
• RE: The <blockcode> and <l> elements Jewett, Jim J
• Re: XML in textarea problem Andrew Clover
• The <blockcode> and <l> elements Lachlan Hunt
• The <h> and <section> elements Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XML in textarea problem Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XML in textarea problem Andrew Clover
• XML in textarea problem Cortland Haws

Monday, 3 November 2003

• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 Øystein Skartsæterhagen
• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 David Woolley
• Re: Accessibility in XHTML 2.0 Draft - Tables David Woolley
• XHTML 2.0 and hreflang Oskar Welzl
• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 Øystein Skartsæterhagen
• Re: 'class' and English element names (was Re: Semantics/Profiles/Namespaces/Modules) Øystein Skartsæterhagen
• Re: <t> element (and others) was (Re: XHTML <time> element proposal) Jeremy Rand
• *** ydk *** Christopher
• Custom tags in Safari? Håkan Magnusson
• Re: Hi translating to azeri Steven Pemberton
• mime type (was: XHTML with Internet Explorer) Jewett, Jim J
• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Accessibility in XHTML 2.0 Draft - Tables Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Accessibility in XHTML 2.0 Draft - Tables Seth Honeycutt
• Re: 'class' and English element names (was Re: Semantics/Profiles/Namespaces/Modules) Jeroen Budts
• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 David Woolley
• Re: 'class' and English element names (was Re: Semantics/Profiles/Namespaces/Modules) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: 'class' and English element names (was Re: Semantics/Profiles/Namespaces/Modules) Karl Dubost

Sunday, 2 November 2003

• Re: <t> element (and others) was (Re: XHTML <time> element proposal) Tantek Çelik
• Re: <t> element (and others) was (Re: XHTML <time> element proposal) Jeremy Rand
• Re: Design aims of XHTML 2.0 Greg Baker
• Design aims of XHTML 2.0 Masayasu Ishikawa
• <t> element (and others) was (Re: XHTML <time> element proposal) Tantek Çelik
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: 'class' and English element names (was Re: Semantics/Profiles/Namespaces/Modules) Tantek Çelik
• Re: XHTML 2.0 <datetime> element proposal Ernest Cline
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Steven Pemberton
• Re: XHTML 2.0 <datetime> element proposal Christoph Päper
• Re: Semantics/Profiles/Namespaces/Modules Re: XHTML <time> element proposal Karl Dubost
• Re: XHTML 2.0 <datetime> element proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Tantek Çelik
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance David Woolley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer David Woolley
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Jim Ley
• Re: Semantics/Profiles/Namespaces/Modules Re: XHTML <time> element proposal Tantek Çelik
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Tantek Çelik
• Re: XHTML with Internet Explorer Tantek Çelik
• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting David Woolley
• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting Ernest Cline
• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML2 dt/dd Nesting Stefan Ram

Saturday, 1 November 2003

• XHTML with Internet Explorer J. King
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Christoph Päper
• Re: Accessibility in XHTML 2.0 Draft Toby A Inkster
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance William F Hammond
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance David Woolley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance David Woolley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance David Woolley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Jim Ley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Ineke van der Maat
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Ian Hickson
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance David Woolley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance David Woolley
• Re: XHTML 2.0 User Agent Conformance David Woolley

Last message date: Thursday, 27 November 2003 14:14:05 UTC