- From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 11:02:49 -0000
- To: <www-html@w3.org>
>> It does not support the mime-type application/xhtml+xml, but text/html is >> (ridiculously) a valid mime-type for XHTML 1.0. > >To agree with Tantek and the others, IE afaik does not support XHTML 1.0. >And text/html is not valid for XHTML 1.0 in general. It accepts a valid XHTML 1 mime-type and renders it appropriately, as you point out below there are things within the XHTML 1.0 specification that it does not do, however if the limit is 100% spec conformance, then there are NO xhtml 1.0 user agents at all, and we might aswell go home now. >Just because you send XHTML 1.0 as text/html in compatibility mode does not >mean, IE supports XHTML 1.0. I would suggest it does, and I've yet to see any arguments that it doesn't other than vigourous assertion, when lots of people (including the W3) are relying on the fact that it does support XHTML 1.0 - if it doesn't why are they sending it to such a user agent? (including my IE which specifically states that XHTML is not acceptable.) >I can't see why the above example should conflict with section 3.1 Document >Conformance of the XHTML 1.0 Recommendation. Sure that internal subset looks like a bug in the way IE supports XHTML 1.0 (or indeed HTML) but see above. Jim.
Received on Wednesday, 5 November 2003 06:04:48 UTC