- From: Jeremy Rand <jeremy@asofok.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 11:54:44 -0800 (PST)
- To: www-html@w3.org
--- Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu> wrote: > On 11/2/03 1:17 PM, "Jeremy Rand" > <jeremy@asofok.org> wrote: > > > > > Tantek Çelik wrote: > > > >> <num> (or <n>) - ordinal or generic numeric > value. > > > > In other words, a mathematical expression. > > not an expression. a single value. > > the grammars of numerous computer languages > understand and demonstrate the > difference between the two. Clarify the meaning of "value." Which of these would fit: 2x+1, 2x, x, 2/3, sqrt(3), 4. IMHO, a "value" is identical to an expression since once the value of all variables is known, an expression can be simplified to a constant, which is always considered a value. Whether the value of the expression is always the same or depends on the value of some variables seems irrelevant to me. > > Wouldn't MathML be > > better-suited for that? > > for expressions yes. for simple numeric values i > believe the expression is > (no pun intended), swatting a fly with a > sledgehammer. > > > (Yes, I know about the "pain to hand-author" > > argument. There are enough MathML generators out > there that it seems > > pretty easy to use one to write the MathML > fragment, and then paste it > > into the XHTML document. Or it could be built > into an XHTML editor, > > like in Amaya.) > > many things are possible. as is mixing various > DocBook XML markup into an > XHTML document. there is still value in adding > simple/generic solutions to > XHTML itself rather than always resorting to > domain-specific specialty > markup. I think you're saying that MathML would be too cumbersome or unwieldy for this purpose. As far as I can tell, marking up a number (or any expression) in MathML would not be more difficult or annoying than using a <num> element. Assuming that a specialized editor is being used (not just a text editor), a <num> element would be used by highlighting some text, and clicking a "number" button. Using MathML, text would be highlighted, and on a Math menu, a "standard math expression" option would be clicked. Not any extra work for authors, but it would be much more flexible. Is there any *disadvantage* to using MathML this way? -Jeremy Rand PS: Sorry if any non-ASCII characters get screwed up in this message; Yahoo!'s webmail won't let me send in Unicode.
Received on Monday, 3 November 2003 14:56:50 UTC