- From: Robert Koberg <rob@koberg.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:00:20 -0800
- To: Christian Wolfgang Hujer <Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com>
- Cc: W3C HTML List <www-html@w3.org>
Hi, Sorry, I did not not understand the question/problem. The example's complexType names were probably misleading. I believe you were correct when you wrote that XML Schema cannot do what you (and Lachlan) describe. You would get a definitive answer on the xmlschema mailing list. I thought about using constraints (key/keyref) but gave up. I thought about using a 'choice' which might be able to be used if you can constrain the choice. The inheritance in XML Schema doesn't cascade like you describe. What you guys need, which can't be done in the same namespace, is to have two completely different elements with the same local-name. I don't know if this is a failing of HTML or XML Schema. Sorry I could not help, -Rob On Nov 19, 2003, at 8:48 AM, Christian Wolfgang Hujer wrote: > > Oh, this may be it, I can't concentrate enough now, so I ask instead > of try it > myself: > Does it mean that if I use <body><noscript></noscript></body>, > <noscript/>'s > content model is that of <body/>, and if I use > <body><p><noscript></noscript></p></body>, <noscript/>'s content model > is > that of <p/>? > > > Bye > - -- > ITCQIS GmbH > Christian Wolfgang Hujer > Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter (Shareholding CEO) > Telefon: +49 (0)89 27 37 04 37 > Telefax: +49 (0)89 27 37 04 39 > E-Mail: Christian.Hujer@itcqis.com > WWW: http://www.itcqis.com/ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE/u579zu6h7O/MKZkRAvpyAKCKPAZUVkIQYak4WTWnbjIDSSpTggCfQPZW > dkZ8Y0l+wRKc/FaTiM47csg= > =Uz2t > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
Received on Wednesday, 19 November 2003 17:01:03 UTC