- From: Oskar Welzl <oskar.welzl@pan.at>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:50:14 +0100
- To: <ernestcline@mindspring.com>, "W3C HTML List" <www-html@w3.org>
Ernest, > Perhaps I was being too subtle. definitely. you should draw large letters with bright coloured crayons when talking to me. ;-) no, it's only that you spotted the problem earlier than i did. > The point I tried to obliquely raise in my > previous post is "Why has type been changed from being > descriptive to being > proscriptive?" i'm getting interested in this point, too. the more i think of it, the worse it gets. and it is, of course, exactly the same with the proposed change to hreflang. we should not only get hreflang back into XHTML 2 (meaning: hreflang as it was until may 2003), we should probably also make people reconsider @type. > I see no reason why type should be changed from being advisory as it is in > HTML4 to being proscriptive as it is in the XHTML2 draft. agreed. regards, oskar
Received on Friday, 14 November 2003 13:49:03 UTC