- From: Lachlan Hunt <lhunt07@postoffice.csu.edu.au>
- Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 01:45:44 +1100
- To: www-html@w3.org
Lachlan Hunt wrote: > Ineke van der Maat wrote: > >> This is not different for xhtml, at least when you serve xhtml as >> application/xml+xhtml, application/xml or text/xml. >> (I had this last night testing a xhtml site served as >> application/xhtml+xml and with a xml-stylesheet-proces instruction on >> the server before validating.) > > Thanks for the tip. I just set up my Apache Tomcat 4.1 server (just > running on localhost) to serve as application/xhtml+xml instead of > text/html and got the same result if I put an error in the page. Correction to my previous message (above): When an XHTML document is served as application/xhtml+xml, Netscape shows well-formedness errors, but not invalid tags, such as <blink>. Also, is it a bug with IE, or just that it hasn't been updated to understand application/xhtml+xml, since when I tried to load the document, it showed a dialog asking me whether to open or save the file, rather then rendering it. Then, selecting open, caused it to open with Netscape (set as my default browser) CYA ...Lachy
Received on Saturday, 1 November 2003 09:45:44 UTC