www-html@w3.org from December 2003 by date

Thursday, 1 January 2004

• Re: How are photo albums done in 100% CSS with no tables? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: xslt problem with ie5.5 Bjoern Hoehrmann

Thursday, 25 December 2003

• xslt problem with ie5.5 Barak Ulmann

Friday, 26 December 2003

• Re: How are photo albums done in 100% CSS with no tables? Steffen Glückselig

Thursday, 25 December 2003

• How are photo albums done in 100% CSS with no tables? Robert Nicholson

Monday, 22 December 2003

• The Worlds Greatest Vitamin! Medical Research

Friday, 19 December 2003

• Definition List Markup advice sought Travis McCauley
• Re: Php Checkboxes David Luo
• Re: Php Checkboxes AmirBehzad Eslami
• Php Checkboxes David Luo
• INVITATION - International MBA Business Tours in China tour

Wednesday, 17 December 2003

• Link from translation site John Snow
• Link from translation site John Snow

Tuesday, 16 December 2003

• green dsr green dsr

Sunday, 14 December 2003

• Re: Structure vs Semantics olafBuddenhagen@web.de

Monday, 15 December 2003

• Re: [XHTML2][CSS3] Tables: A proposal to support styling by columns Ernest Cline
• Re: [XHTML2][CSS3] Tables: A proposal to support styling by columns Lachlan Hunt
• [XHTML2][CSS3] Tables: A proposal to support styling by columns Ernest Cline

Sunday, 14 December 2003

• Re: But are <abbr/> et al. anything more than presentation? Jens Meiert
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Toby A Inkster
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jim Ley

Saturday, 13 December 2003

• Re: Is this an error in the DTD for xhtml 1.1? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: [XHTML2] On the subject of handling quotations Ernest Cline
• Is this an error in the DTD for xhtml 1.1? James Edward Hill
• Re: [XHTML2] On the subject of handling quotations Lachlan Hunt
• For Immediate release -- Diebold troubles deepen Eric A. Smith
• Re: [XHTML2] On the subject of handling quotations Ernest Cline
• Re: [XHTML2] On the subject of handling quotations Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [XHTML2] On the subject of handling quotations Ineke van der Maat
• [XHTML2] On the subject of handling quotations Ernest Cline

Friday, 12 December 2003

• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jukka K. Korpela
• summary of (RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft) Jewett, Jim J
• Your 2004 business development plan GiveThemYourBest Marketing
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Derek Featherstone
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• Re: extending CSS is unnecessary Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• But are <abbr/> et al. anything more than presentation? Ernest Cline
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft jon@hackcraft.net
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• Re: extending CSS is unnecessary Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Christoph Päper
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft David Poehlman
• Re: extending CSS is unnecessary Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: extending CSS is unnecessary Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Christoph Päper
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Kurt_Mattes@bankone.com
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft John Colby
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Brian Kelly
• extending CSS is unnecessary Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Charles McCathieNevile
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft David Woolley

Thursday, 11 December 2003

• Re: Structure vs Semantics Chris Mannall
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Karl Dubost
• grandchild restrictions (was: RE: Structure vs Semantics) Jewett, Jim J
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Ernest Cline
• Re: How do I get off this list? please tell me, someone J. King
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Chris Mannall
• RE: Structure vs Semantics Jukka K. Korpela
• RE: Structure vs Semantics Jewett, Jim J
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Christoph Päper
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Karl Dubost
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Re: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Karl Dubost
• How do I get off this list? please tell me, someone templar wales
• Re: Values of disabled form elements not submitted Jukka K. Korpela
• Values of disabled form elements not submitted Markus Ernst
• RE: Abbreviations and Acronyms: [techs] Latest HTML Techniques Draft Jens Meiert

Wednesday, 10 December 2003

• Re: XHTML2 <caption> and <summary> elements John Meyer
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Ernest Cline
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Ernest Cline
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Chris Mannall
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Ernest Cline
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Karl Dubost
• An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam! Eric A. Smith
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Chris Moschini
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Does this work? Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal David Woolley
• Re: Proposed 'Author' link-type David Woolley
• Re: Structure vs Semantics David Woolley

Tuesday, 9 December 2003

• Proposed 'Author' link-type Andy Holmes

Wednesday, 10 December 2003

• Does this work? Jitender Kumar C

Tuesday, 9 December 2003

• funny and frightening :) (: Sir Wizard Ak

Wednesday, 10 December 2003

• Re: Structure vs Semantics Ernest Cline

Tuesday, 9 December 2003

• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Jukka K. Korpela
• CFP: International Conference on Intelligent Agents, Web Technologies and Internet Commerce cimca
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Chris Moschini
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Ernest Cline
• <block> and aural (was: RE: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/>) Jewett, Jim J
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Ernest Cline
• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Ineke van der Maat
• SOME PEOPLE HAVE SHOWN THEIR IGNORANCE Nicolas D
• Fwd: Removal From List Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Lachlan Hunt
• Re: Structure vs Semantics Lachlan Hunt
• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Jens Meiert
• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Ernest Cline
• Re: [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Jens Meiert
• [XHTML2] Inline list element proposal Ernest Cline
• An urgent plea for your assistance -- this is NOT spam! Eric A. Smith
• Re: nesting and the newly promiscuous href Lachlan Hunt

Monday, 8 December 2003

• RE: nesting and the newly promiscuous href Jewett, Jim J
• Re: nesting and the newly promiscuous href Chris Mannall
• nesting and the newly promiscuous href Jewett, Jim J
• Structure vs Semantics (was: RE: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/ > and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/>) Jewett, Jim J
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Karl Dubost
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Karl Dubost
• Re: <a> and @href (was: Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/>) olafBuddenhagen@web.de
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Ernest Cline
• Re: <a> and @href (was: Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/>) Ernest Cline

Sunday, 7 December 2003

• LET'S Find a point of use. comments is comments? Адриан Юрьевич Аникушин
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: <a> and @href (was: Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/>) Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Ernest Cline
• Re: <a> and @href (was: Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/>) Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Jukka K. Korpela

Saturday, 6 December 2003

• NEW WEBSITE pltreasures@mail.com
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Ernest Cline
• Re: backwards compatibility solution (was: vague thing about grid tag) Toby A Inkster
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Toby A Inkster
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Jukka K. Korpela
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Ernest Cline
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Andy Holmes
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Lachlan Hunt

Friday, 5 December 2003

• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Karl Dubost
• XHTML 2.0 Drafting Process - Duration and Coordination bhartung@gmx.de
• backwards compatibility solution (was: vague thing about grid tag) Stephen Brooks
• Why would anyone move to xhtml 2.0? (and some problems with the current draft) Jewett, Jim J
• Re: vague thought - grid tag Lachlan Hunt
• XHTML2 <caption> and <summary> elements Lachlan Hunt
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Lachlan Hunt
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Ernest Cline
• Re: vague thought - grid tag Stephen Brooks
• Welcome! Fat Cat Media
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: vague thought - grid tag Lachlan Hunt

Thursday, 4 December 2003

• Re: Using David Woolley
• Re: vague thought - grid tag David Woolley
• Re: layouthook (was: RE: vague thought - grid tag) David Woolley
• Re: layouthook (was: RE: vague thought - grid tag) Patrick Griffiths
• layouthook (was: RE: vague thought - grid tag) Jewett, Jim J
• Re: <base/>, @xml:base Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: vague thought - grid tag David Dorward
• Re: vague thought - grid tag Stephen Brooks
• Re: vague thought - grid tag Patrick Griffiths
• Re: vague thought - grid tag Stephen Brooks
• Re: vague thought - grid tag David Dorward
• Re: vague thought - grid tag Patrick Griffiths
• vague thought - grid tag Stephen Brooks
• RE: <base/>, @xml:base Jewett, Jim J
• RE: Using Tim Thorpe
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Ernest Cline

Wednesday, 3 December 2003

• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT David Woolley
• <base/>, @xml:base and DNS fallback (Was: Re: a recommendation...) Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Ernest Cline
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Fastpitch Central - Bill
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Ernest Cline
• Re: Using Ernest Cline
• Re: Using Tim Thorpe
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Fastpitch Central - Bill
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Ernest Cline
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: a recommendation - Received on Thursday, 18 April 2002 14:01:42 EDT Fastpitch Central - Bill

Tuesday, 2 December 2003

• html Arturo Vargas Castillo
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Ernest Cline
• XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <contact/> and <blockcontact/> to replace <address/> Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Lachlan Hunt
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Lachlan Hunt

Monday, 1 December 2003

• Re: XHTML 2.0 Roadmap Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Jukka K. Korpela
• XHTML 2.0: Suggestion for <addr/> and <blockaddr/> to replace <address/> Christian Wolfgang Hujer
• Re: XHTML 2.0 Roadmap Arthur Wiebe
• RE: XHTML 2.0 Roadmap Ernest Cline
• XHTML 2.0 Roadmap Arthur Wiebe

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 December 2003 20:49:06 UTC