- From: Chris Mannall <chris.mannall@hecubagames.com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:54:26 +0000
- To: ernestcline@mindspring.com, www-html@w3.org
Ernest Cline wrote: >>[Original Message] >>From: Chris Mannall <chris.mannall@hecubagames.com> >> >> Was so-and-so correct when he said "such and such?" >> >> Was so-and-so correct when he said "such and such"? >> >>This could be seen as solvable by either including the question mark >>in the <q> element or not, but I don't think it's as simple as that. The >>question mark isn't part of the quotation, so I don't see that it should >>be included in the <q> element, but I may still wish to *present* the >>quotation in the first form. > > > Actually, no. The usual rule in English for punctuation other than > "," and "," is that it is placed inside the quotation marks only if it is > part of the quote. After checking, I've discovered my example involving the question mark is indeed wrong - question marks are only included within the quotation marks if they are part of the quote. You're not strictly correct about the comma and full stop though (I assume you meant full stop) - there are differences between American English and British English. Dictionary.com's take on the matter[1]: <quote> - In American usage, punctuation that goes inside the closing quotation mark includes a period or comma (but not a colon or semicolon). In British usage, the period and the comma go outside the quotation mark. The dash, question mark, and exclamation point fall inside quotation marks if they belong with the quoted matter but outside if they punctuate the sentence as a whole. - For quotations which extend beyond one paragraph, a quotation mark begins each paragraph and the closing quotation mark is at the end of the last paragraph. - Some writers leave periods and commas outside of quoted material if that punctuation belongs to the sentence as a whole. </quote> So there *is* a presentational difference that has to be taken into account here. > That the usual rule is often violated is a problem, but not one that > is solvable by XHTML. However, your example has given me > yet another thing to think about. I agree it's not the place of XHTML to try to force the correct use of language; on the other hand though, I'm not sure that we should be talking about adding algorithms for determining the placing of quotation marks. I don't want to find us arguing in three to four years time about having to *remove* that feature due to the natural evolution of the English language. - Chris Mannall [1] http://dictionary.com/help/faq/language/p/punctuationmarks.html
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2003 17:45:40 UTC