public-ws-addressing@w3.org from June 2005 by author

Abbie Barbir

RE: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)

Aleksander Slominski

Re: [soapbuilders] current best practice for using WS-Addressing in WSDL 1.1? (Wednesday, 8 June)
current best practice for using WS-Addressing in WSDL 1.1? (Wednesday, 8 June)

Amelia A Lewis

Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)

Anish Karmarkar

Re: Issue LC90 (Tuesday, 28 June)
LC103 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Requirements for one-way MEP (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Requirements for one-way MEP (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: wsa:FaultTo unusable for SOAP mustUnderstand faults (Monday, 13 June)
Re: content of fault detail (Monday, 13 June)
LC72 action item (Thursday, 2 June)

Bergersen, Rebecca

Regrets for 6/20 (Monday, 20 June)

Bob Freund

RE: Email glitch (Wednesday, 15 June)

Christopher B Ferris

Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)

Conor P. Cahill

Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)

David Hull

Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-06-27 (Saturday, 25 June)
In the spirit of real-time editing (Monday, 20 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Monday, 20 June)
Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-06-20 (Monday, 20 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Tuesday, 14 June)
Email glitch (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: How does Message ID coordinate with existing message ID facilities? (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 14 June)
Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Monday, 13 June)
How does Message ID coordinate with existing message ID facilities? (Monday, 13 June)
Message ID use cases: (Monday, 13 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Wednesday, 8 June)
AI: Faults/error conditions (Thursday, 2 June)

David Orchard

RE: Self-describing Messages wrt MEPs (Thursday, 23 June)
RE: Self-describing Messages wrt MEPs (Wednesday, 22 June)
Self-describing Messages wrt MEPs (Tuesday, 21 June)

Doug Davis

RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Wednesday, 8 June)

Eran Chinthaka

Reference Parameters resolution (Friday, 17 June)

Francisco Curbera

Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: [i60] Splitting semantics of namespace across multiple WS-A specs inhibits independent versioning (Thursday, 2 June)

Glen Daniels

RE: LC68 - Use-cases (Monday, 27 June)
LC68 - Use-cases (Monday, 27 June)

Hugo Haas

Re: wsa:FaultTo unusable for SOAP mustUnderstand faults (Thursday, 9 June)
Re: wsa:FaultTo unusable for SOAP mustUnderstand faults (Thursday, 9 June)

J.P. Martin-Flatin

2nd CFP: European Conference on Web Services (ECOWS 2005) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Jacek Kopecky

Re: content of fault detail (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: content of fault detail (Monday, 13 June)
Re: content of fault detail (Friday, 3 June)

Jeff Mischkinsky

Re: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Friday, 17 June)

Jim Webber

RE: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Friday, 17 June)

Jonathan Marsh

[LC107]: WS Description WG comments on WS-A (editorial) (Wednesday, 29 June)
RE: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: How does Message ID coordinate with existing message ID facilities? (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 14 June)

Katy Warr

Proposal for i050 : introduction of EPR to indicate 'noReply' (Monday, 27 June)

Marc Hadley

Re: Self-describing Messages wrt MEPs (Thursday, 23 June)
Re: Reference Parameters resolution (Wednesday, 22 June)
Proposal for lc87 and lc55 (Monday, 20 June)
Re: content of fault detail (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: content of fault detail (Monday, 13 June)
Re: on LC75 (Saturday, 4 June)
Proposal for closing issue lc103 (Thursday, 2 June)

Mark Little

Re: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)

Mark Nottingham

Minutes of the 2005-06-27 teleconference (Tuesday, 28 June)
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-06-27 (Saturday, 25 June)
Minutes of the 2005-06-20 teleconference (Tuesday, 21 June)
Re: Requirements for one-way MEP (Tuesday, 21 June)
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-06-20 (Sunday, 19 June)
New text for sections 3.1 and 3.3 [lc84] (Sunday, 19 June)
Minutes of the 2005-06-13 teleconference (Wednesday, 15 June)
Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Monday, 13 June)
Re: Minutes of the Berlin F2F (Sunday, 12 June)
Minutes of the Berlin F2F (Sunday, 12 June)
Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-06-13 (Sunday, 12 June)
Re: content of fault detail (Sunday, 12 June)

paul.downey@bt.com

RE: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Wednesday, 15 June)
RE: wsa:FaultTo unusable for SOAP mustUnderstand faults (Thursday, 9 June)
RE: [soapbuilders] current best practice for using WS-Addressing in WSDL 1.1? (Wednesday, 8 June)
RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Wednesday, 8 June)
RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Prasad Yendluri

Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: LC68 - Use-cases (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Monday, 20 June)
Re: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Monday, 20 June)
Regrets for WS-A telcon 2005-06-13 (Sunday, 12 June)

Rich Salz

Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: on LC75 (Monday, 6 June)
Re: on LC75 (Saturday, 4 June)

Robert Freund

RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Wednesday, 8 June)
RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Wednesday, 8 June)
RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (Monday, 6 June)

Rogers, Tony

RE: Issue LC90 (Tuesday, 28 June)
RE: Issue LC90 (Tuesday, 28 June)
RE: Self-describing Messages wrt MEPs (Wednesday, 22 June)
RE: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: How does Message ID coordinate with existing message ID facilities? (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: wsa:FaultTo unusable for SOAP mustUnderstand faults (Thursday, 9 June)

Savas Parastatidis

RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)

Springer, Ian P.

RE: Reference Parameters resolution (Wednesday, 22 June)

Tom Rutt

Re: Issue LC90 (Monday, 27 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Thursday, 16 June)
Re: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 14 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Monday, 13 June)
Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Monday, 13 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Wednesday, 8 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Monday, 6 June)
Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (Monday, 6 June)
Re: on LC75 (Sunday, 5 June)
Re: on LC75 (Sunday, 5 June)
Re: on LC75 (Sunday, 5 June)
on LC75 (Saturday, 4 June)

Welf Löwe

NEW DEADLINE: Third European Conference on Web Services - ECOWS 2005 (Thursday, 16 June)

Yalcinalp, Umit

RE: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: Proposal for lc75/lc88 (Tuesday, 14 June)
RE: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? (Monday, 13 June)
RE: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) (Wednesday, 8 June)

Last message date: Wednesday, 29 June 2005 19:25:27 UTC