- From: Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 09:55:24 -0700
- To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- CC: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
That was one of the issues that was raised in http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/#lc1 also. TC was not prepared to make it even a SHOULD requirement in the context of discussion of that issue :) Now that 86 is closed with no action also, I am not holding up hopes but I think having [message id] in all messages is very useful. David Hull wrote: >If [message id] is to be leveraged for uses other than correlation, >particularly duplicate elimination and security, wouldn't those >considerations apply at least equally well to non request/reply >interactions? If not, what is the basis for requiring [message id] for >requests but not for other types of message? > > >
Received on Monday, 20 June 2005 16:55:32 UTC