- From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 01:07:05 +0200
- To: "David Hull" <dmh@tibco.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org > [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Hull > Sent: Monday, Jun 13, 2005 3:07 PM > To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org > Subject: Why is [message id] required for requests but not > for other messages? > > > If [message id] is to be leveraged for uses other than correlation, > particularly duplicate elimination and security, wouldn't those > considerations apply at least equally well to non request/reply > interactions? If not, what is the basis for requiring > [message id] for > requests but not for other types of message? > > > Well, if you recall from the f2f, we wanted to require message id across the board :-) --umit
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 23:07:23 UTC