- From: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 08:40:18 +0200
- To: tom@coastin.com
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
- Message-id: <9CCA283C-58E1-4FE9-8ACE-54DE0393E7A6@Sun.COM>
If we go this route I'd like to suggest we also add an optional timestamp field. I've had several requests for WS-addressing to offer support for such a thing separate from the message id itself. Marc. On Jun 4, 2005, at 3:36 AM, Tom Rutt wrote: > > Tom make messageID useful for next versions of either ws- > reliability or ws reliable messageing, it should be a complex type. > > A group ID ( which is globally unique in space and time) along with > an optional sequence number integer attribute would make > this wsa:messageID useable by these other specs. > > If sequences are not required, then the optional integer sequence > number attribute would not have to be present. > > Otherwise, a request response exchange using reliability will > require two different message ids, one for wsa another for ws-rx. > > I will send a future message with the simple schema for this. > > TomRutt > > -- > ---------------------------------------------------- > Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com > Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133 > > > > --- Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems.
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Saturday, 4 June 2005 06:40:25 UTC