- From: Robert Freund <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
- Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 23:04:06 -0400
- To: "'Robert Freund'" <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>, <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 03:04:15 UTC
Change of one MUST to MAY _____ From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Robert Freund Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 10:59 PM To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language Note that I have not attempted to address the comments on this list concerning time stamp or other complex type proposals since they are beyond the scope of the lc comments. -bob The value of [message id] uniquely identifies the message. When present, it is the responsibility of the sender to insure that each message is uniquely identified. A receiver MAY treat all messages that contain the same [message id] as the same message. If a reply is expected and a back-channel may not be available, [message id] MUST be present. No specific algorithm for the generation of unique values of [message id] is given, however methods such as the use of an IRI that exists within a domain owned by the sender combined with a sequence satisfies the uniqueness criteria but may not be the best practice from a security perspective.
Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 03:04:15 UTC