- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:57:57 -0400
- To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: tom@coastin.com, "Yalcinalp, Umit" <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
- Message-id: <42AF1AA5.1060308@tibco.com>
Jonathan Marsh wrote: >If the draft minutes are accurate, some of us voted to make [message ID] >mandatory, others to make it optional at all times, but the bulk of the >WG voted to simply 86 issue lc86. I don't know what more to >productively say on the topic at this point. > > Yes, and that all happened pretty quickly toward the end of a long day. Understanding why the result came out the way it did seems like a productive endeavor, particularly since we're still hammering out the semantics of [message id] and the reasons for making it mandatory (but only in that particular case) look to have some bearing on the semantics. >>-----Original Message----- >>From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws- >>addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tom Rutt >>Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 4:21 PM >>To: Yalcinalp, Umit >>Cc: David Hull; public-ws-addressing@w3.org >>Subject: Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for >>other messages? >> >> >>check my concern below umit's comment >> >>Yalcinalp, Umit wrote: >> >> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org >>>>[mailto:public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Hull >>>>Sent: Monday, Jun 13, 2005 3:07 PM >>>>To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org >>>>Subject: Why is [message id] required for requests but not >>>>for other messages? >>>> >>>> >>>>If [message id] is to be leveraged for uses other than correlation, >>>>particularly duplicate elimination and security, wouldn't those >>>>considerations apply at least equally well to non request/reply >>>>interactions? If not, what is the basis for requiring >>>>[message id] for >>>>requests but not for other types of message? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Well, if you recall from the f2f, we wanted to require message id >>> >>> >>across >> >> >>>the board :-) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>but those semantics are not there in the present document, MesssageId >>is >>only required when correlation of a reply is required. >> >>Tom Rutt >> >> >> >>>--umit >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>-- >>---------------------------------------------------- >>Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com >>Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133 >> >> >> >> > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2005 17:58:19 UTC