- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:43:43 -0700
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group - distributed meeting agenda Monday, 27 Jun 20:00-22:00 UTC; 13:00-15:00 US/Pacific; 16:00-18:00 US/Eastern; 21:00-23:00 UK/London; 22:00-24:00 FR/Paris; 6:00-8:00 (Tuesday) AU/ Melbourne & AU/Brisbane Dial-in information on WG Admin page <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ addr/admin> 1. Roll call, select scribe (see scribe list below) 2. Agenda review, AOB 3. Call for corrections to the minutes - 2005-06-20: <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/06/20-ws-addr- minutes.html> 4. Review action items <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/ admin#actionitems> 2005-06-20: lc103 - Anish Karmarkar to review Core section 3.3 to see if there's still a problem. PENDING 2005-06-20: lc104 - Anish Karmarkar to start discussion on how extensions map into a specific bucket. PENDING 2005-06-20: lc20 - David Hull to write up proposal regarding "return to sender" semantics for anonymous. PENDING 2005-06-20: i050 - Katy Warr to write up explicit "not allowed" URI proposal. PENDING õnalp to write up proposal that describes abstract EPR extensibility. PENDING 5. Face-to-Face registration and logistics Linked from WG Admin page <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin> 6. Coordination <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Jun/ 0104.html> 7. Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/> * lc90 - Security implications of [message id] in re-transmissions (last week, proposal was to drop the relevant paragraph) * lc68 - no mustUnderstand extensibility * lc20 - Clarify Anonymous URI and for the case of HTTP responses ACTION: 2005-06-20: David Hull to write up proposal regarding "return to sender" semantics for anonymous. PENDING * lc104 - XML infoset representation of EPR > Information model ACTION: 2005-06-20: Anish Karmarkar to start discussion on how extensions map into a specific bucket. PENDING * lc101 - How does one extend the abstract properties of an endpoint reference ACTION: 2005-06-20: Umit Yalcinalp to write up proposal that describes abstract EPR extensibility. PENDING * lc103 - what is a 'request' and what is a 'reply'? * lc107 - WS Description WG comments on WS-A ACTION: 2005-06-20: Anish Karmarkar to review Core section 3.3 to see if there's still a problem. PENDING Proposal 1: <http://www.w3.org/mid/1191ECEA-0CEB-47B0-B915- BA21B2F8D196@Sun.COM> * lc69 - mandatory ReplyTo, handling replies in WS-Addressing * lc108 - Comment from WSDL group on ReplyTo * i050 - Misalignment of treatment of reply messages and fault messages * lc87 - Security model is insufficient * lc55 - ReplyTo and security * lc76 - Supported faults Proposal 1: <http://www.w3.org/mid/429F8F0F.7080906@tibco.com> * lc5 - Utility of [source endpoint] property not clear 8. Other Business ----------------------------------------------------------- Scribe list A participant from the Member at the top of the list is expected to scribe the meeting. If no participant from that Member is able to scribe, a participant from the the next Member on the list is expected to scribe, and so forth. After one participant from a Member scribes, that Member's name goes to the bottom of the list. Systinet SAP Nortel Novell TIBCO IBM Datapower webMethods SeeBeyond Fujitsu IONA Microsoft BEA W3C CA BT Nokia Arjuna Oracle Hitachi Sonoa HP Sonic Sun ERICSSON See <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/minutes.html> for more information about taking minutes. -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Saturday, 25 June 2005 00:43:48 UTC