- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:43:43 -0700
- To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
W3C Web Services Addressing Working Group - distributed meeting agenda
Monday, 27 Jun
20:00-22:00 UTC; 13:00-15:00 US/Pacific; 16:00-18:00 US/Eastern;
21:00-23:00 UK/London; 22:00-24:00 FR/Paris; 6:00-8:00 (Tuesday) AU/
Melbourne & AU/Brisbane
Dial-in information on WG Admin page <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/
addr/admin>
1. Roll call, select scribe
(see scribe list below)
2. Agenda review, AOB
3. Call for corrections to the minutes
- 2005-06-20: <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/5/06/20-ws-addr-
minutes.html>
4. Review action items <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/
admin#actionitems>
2005-06-20: lc103 - Anish Karmarkar to review Core section 3.3
to see if there's still a problem. PENDING
2005-06-20: lc104 - Anish Karmarkar to start discussion on how
extensions map into a specific bucket. PENDING
2005-06-20: lc20 - David Hull to write up proposal regarding
"return to sender" semantics for anonymous. PENDING
2005-06-20: i050 - Katy Warr to write up explicit "not allowed"
URI proposal. PENDING
õnalp to write up proposal that describes abstract EPR
extensibility. PENDING
5. Face-to-Face registration and logistics
Linked from WG Admin page <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/admin>
6. Coordination
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2005Jun/
0104.html>
7. Issues <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/lc-issues/>
* lc90 - Security implications of [message id] in re-transmissions
(last week, proposal was to drop the relevant paragraph)
* lc68 - no mustUnderstand extensibility
* lc20 - Clarify Anonymous URI and for the case of HTTP responses
ACTION: 2005-06-20: David Hull to write up proposal regarding
"return to sender" semantics for anonymous. PENDING
* lc104 - XML infoset representation of EPR > Information model
ACTION: 2005-06-20: Anish Karmarkar to start discussion on how
extensions map into a specific bucket. PENDING
* lc101 - How does one extend the abstract properties of an endpoint
reference
ACTION: 2005-06-20: Umit Yalcinalp to write up proposal that
describes abstract EPR extensibility. PENDING
* lc103 - what is a 'request' and what is a 'reply'?
* lc107 - WS Description WG comments on WS-A
ACTION: 2005-06-20: Anish Karmarkar to review Core section 3.3 to
see if there's still a problem. PENDING
Proposal 1: <http://www.w3.org/mid/1191ECEA-0CEB-47B0-B915-
BA21B2F8D196@Sun.COM>
* lc69 - mandatory ReplyTo, handling replies in WS-Addressing
* lc108 - Comment from WSDL group on ReplyTo
* i050 - Misalignment of treatment of reply messages and fault messages
* lc87 - Security model is insufficient
* lc55 - ReplyTo and security
* lc76 - Supported faults
Proposal 1: <http://www.w3.org/mid/429F8F0F.7080906@tibco.com>
* lc5 - Utility of [source endpoint] property not clear
8. Other Business
-----------------------------------------------------------
Scribe list
A participant from the Member at the top of the list is expected to
scribe the meeting. If no participant from that Member is able to
scribe, a participant from the the next Member on the list is
expected to scribe, and so forth. After one participant from a Member
scribes, that Member's name goes to the bottom of the list.
Systinet
SAP
Nortel
Novell
TIBCO
IBM
Datapower
webMethods
SeeBeyond
Fujitsu
IONA
Microsoft
BEA
W3C
CA
BT
Nokia
Arjuna
Oracle
Hitachi
Sonoa
HP
Sonic
Sun
ERICSSON
See <http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/minutes.html> for more
information about taking minutes.
--
Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist
Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Saturday, 25 June 2005 00:43:48 UTC