- From: Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 19:09:11 -0400
- To: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- CC: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
I would like to clarify that the existing reliability specs do not use wsa:messageId for their protocol. both ws-reliability http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsrm/2004/06/WS-Reliability-CD1.086.pdf and ws-reliableMessageing http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/specification/ws-rm/ use a sequenceID, SequenceNo pair to identify a message using their protocol. Tom Rutt David Hull wrote: >If [message id] is to be leveraged for uses other than correlation, >particularly duplicate elimination and security, wouldn't those >considerations apply at least equally well to non request/reply >interactions? If not, what is the basis for requiring [message id] for >requests but not for other types of message? > > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------- Tom Rutt email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com Tel: +1 732 801 5744 Fax: +1 732 774 5133
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 23:11:30 UTC