Re: Another go at lc75 and lc88 language (correction) from Rich Salz on 2005-06-06 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from June 2005)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 13:19:10 -0400
To: tom@coastin.com
CC: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-ID: <42A4858E.4060603@datapower.com>

> This scheme allows more scalable implementations (e.g, get uri at 
> bootup, use system time when message composed cast as unsigned long for 
> the integer portion of the message Id.

Isn't this an implementation detail?  There are other mechanisms that 
are similarly efficient and opaque (e.g., uuid's)

> If we did this change, the relibility specs might utilize ws addressing 
> message Id when present in a message.

And they wouldn't if we didn't?  Why?

	/r$

-- 
Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology                           http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway   http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

Received on Monday, 6 June 2005 17:14:30 UTC