Re: Why is [message id] required for requests but not for other messages? from Rich Salz on 2005-06-16 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from June 2005)

From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:44:33 -0400 (EDT)
To: "Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>
cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0506160942110.23969-100000@smtp.datapower.com>

> So, how about using RequestID.

+1

Whatever the name is, MessageID is too fraught with other meanings.
Like "hacker," it's just time to concede defeat.
	/r$
-- 
Rich Salz                  Chief Security Architect
DataPower Technology       http://www.datapower.com
XS40 XML Security Gateway  http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html

Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 13:44:37 UTC